385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16862505)
1. [Signal loss in magnetic resonance imaging caused by intraoral anchored dental magnetic materials].
Blankenstein FH; Truong B; Thomas A; Schröder RJ; Naumann M
Rofo; 2006 Aug; 178(8):787-93. PubMed ID: 16862505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Measurements of the flux densities of static magnetic fields generated by two types of dental magnetic attachments and their retentive forces].
Xu C; Chao YL; Du L; Yang L
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 May; 35(3):412-5. PubMed ID: 15181852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image correction during large and rapid B(0) variations in an open MRI system with permanent magnets using navigator echoes and phase compensation.
Li J; Wang Y; Jiang Y; Xie H; Li G
Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 27(7):988-93. PubMed ID: 19369023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance imaging applications at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: a comparative study.
Schmidt GP; Wintersperger B; Graser A; Baur-Melnyk A; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):449-59. PubMed ID: 17507818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional ultrashort echo time imaging of solid polymers on a 3-Tesla whole-body MRI scanner.
Springer F; Martirosian P; Schwenzer NF; Szimtenings M; Kreisler P; Claussen CD; Schick F
Invest Radiol; 2008 Nov; 43(11):802-8. PubMed ID: 18923260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio?
Schindera ST; Merkle EM; Dale BM; Delong DM; Nelson RC
Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1236-43. PubMed ID: 16979073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts.
Starcuková J; Starcuk Z; Hubálková H; Linetskiy I
Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 17884157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lung MRI at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: observer preference study and lesion contrast using five different pulse sequences.
Fink C; Puderbach M; Biederer J; Fabel M; Dietrich O; Kauczor HU; Reiser MF; Schönberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):377-83. PubMed ID: 17507808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of galvano-ceramic and metal-ceramic crowns on magnetic resonance imaging.
Chen DP; Wu GY; Wang YN
Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Jan; 123(2):208-11. PubMed ID: 20137372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging of microstructure transition in stainless steel.
Peeters JM; van Faassen EE; Bakker CJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jun; 24(5):663-72. PubMed ID: 16735191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on internal magnet strength in Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implants.
Wackym PA; Michel MA; Prost RW; Banks KL; Runge-Samuelson CL; Firszt JB
Laryngoscope; 2004 Aug; 114(8):1355-61. PubMed ID: 15280707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Artifacts from dental metal alloys in magnetic resonance imaging].
Cao Z; Chen LL; Gong XY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(26):1855-8. PubMed ID: 19040024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microimaging at 14 tesla using GESEPI for removal of magnetic susceptibility artifacts in T(2)(*)-weighted image contrast.
Yang QX; Smith MB; Briggs RW; Rycyna RE
J Magn Reson; 1999 Nov; 141(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10527737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in an open low-field magnetic resonance imaging system: clinical experience and technical considerations.
Szelényi A; Gasser T; Seifert V
Neurosurgery; 2008 Oct; 63(4 Suppl 2):268-75; discussion 275-6. PubMed ID: 18981832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo biochemical 7.0 Tesla magnetic resonance: preliminary results of dGEMRIC, zonal T2, and T2* mapping of articular cartilage.
Welsch GH; Mamisch TC; Hughes T; Zilkens C; Quirbach S; Scheffler K; Kraff O; Schweitzer ME; Szomolanyi P; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):619-26. PubMed ID: 18708855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Artifact reduction from metallic dental materials in T1-weighted spin-echo imaging at 3.0 tesla.
Zho SY; Kim MO; Lee KW; Kim DH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Feb; 37(2):471-8. PubMed ID: 22941956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Influence of sequence type on the extent of the susceptibility artifact in MRI--a shoulder specimen study after suture anchor repair].
Herold T; Caro WC; Heers G; Perlick L; Grifka J; Feuerbach S; Nitz W; Lenhart M
Rofo; 2004 Sep; 176(9):1296-301. PubMed ID: 15346265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [MRI safety aspects and artifacts of atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale occluders at 1.5 tesla: a phantom study].
Bock M; Mohrs OK; Voigtlaender T; Kauczor HU; Semmler W
Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):272-7. PubMed ID: 16508833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accurate and sensitive measurements of magnetic susceptibility using echo planar imaging.
Carlsson A; Starck G; Ljungberg M; Ekholm S; Forssell-Aronsson E
Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(9):1179-85. PubMed ID: 17071340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
