These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

561 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16862531)

  • 1. Protein-ligand docking: current status and future challenges.
    Sousa SF; Fernandes PA; Ramos MJ
    Proteins; 2006 Oct; 65(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 16862531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
    Perola E; Walters WP; Charifson PS
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 15211508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions.
    Halperin I; Ma B; Wolfson H; Nussinov R
    Proteins; 2002 Jun; 47(4):409-43. PubMed ID: 12001221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
    Warren GL; Andrews CW; Capelli AM; Clarke B; LaLonde J; Lambert MH; Lindvall M; Nevins N; Semus SF; Senger S; Tedesco G; Wall ID; Woolven JM; Peishoff CE; Head MS
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ligand-protein docking with water molecules.
    Roberts BC; Mancera RL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):397-408. PubMed ID: 18211049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A general approach for developing system-specific functions to score protein-ligand docked complexes using support vector inductive logic programming.
    Amini A; Shrimpton PJ; Muggleton SH; Sternberg MJ
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):823-31. PubMed ID: 17910057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Molecular docking.
    Morris GM; Lim-Wilby M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 443():365-82. PubMed ID: 18446297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Complementarity of hydrophobic properties in ATP-protein binding: a new criterion to rank docking solutions.
    Pyrkov TV; Kosinsky YA; Arseniev AS; Priestle JP; Jacoby E; Efremov RG
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):388-98. PubMed ID: 17094116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking.
    Jones G; Willett P; Glen RC; Leach AR; Taylor R
    J Mol Biol; 1997 Apr; 267(3):727-48. PubMed ID: 9126849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
    Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rapid protein-ligand docking using soft modes from molecular dynamics simulations to account for protein deformability: binding of FK506 to FKBP.
    Zacharias M
    Proteins; 2004 Mar; 54(4):759-67. PubMed ID: 14997571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fully automated molecular mechanics based induced fit protein-ligand docking method.
    Koska J; Spassov VZ; Maynard AJ; Yan L; Austin N; Flook PK; Venkatachalam CM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct; 48(10):1965-73. PubMed ID: 18816046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 3. Impact of input ligand conformation, protein flexibility, and water molecules on the accuracy of docking programs.
    Corbeil CR; Moitessier N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):997-1009. PubMed ID: 19391631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Importance of molecular computer modeling in anticancer drug development.
    Geromichalos GD
    J BUON; 2007 Sep; 12 Suppl 1():S101-18. PubMed ID: 17935268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonequilibrium, multiple-timescale simulations of ligand-receptor interactions in structured protein systems.
    Zhang Y; Peters MH; Li Y
    Proteins; 2003 Aug; 52(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 12866048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EADock: docking of small molecules into protein active sites with a multiobjective evolutionary optimization.
    Grosdidier A; Zoete V; Michielin O
    Proteins; 2007 Jun; 67(4):1010-25. PubMed ID: 17380512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Managing protein flexibility in docking and its applications.
    B-Rao C; Subramanian J; Sharma SD
    Drug Discov Today; 2009 Apr; 14(7-8):394-400. PubMed ID: 19185058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects.
    Sherman W; Day T; Jacobson MP; Friesner RA; Farid R
    J Med Chem; 2006 Jan; 49(2):534-53. PubMed ID: 16420040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of protein-ligand interaction fingerprints in docking.
    Brewerton SC
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2008 May; 11(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 18428089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.