These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16862721)

  • 1. Don't shoot the messenger.
    New Sci; 2006 Jun 17-23; 190(2556):5. PubMed ID: 16862721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Media attack prompts editorial backlash against MMR study.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6977):765. PubMed ID: 14985719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In no one's best interest.
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6978):1. PubMed ID: 14999243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Institutional research misconduct.
    Godlee F
    BMJ; 2011 Nov; 343():d7284. PubMed ID: 22077093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assuring research integrity in the wake of Wakefield.
    Opel DJ; Diekema DS; Marcuse EK
    BMJ; 2011 Jan; 342():d2. PubMed ID: 21245120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A statement by the editors of The Lancet.
    Horton R
    Lancet; 2004 Mar; 363(9411):820-1. PubMed ID: 15022645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is research safe in their hands?
    Marcovitch H
    BMJ; 2011 Jan; 342():d284. PubMed ID: 21248020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A statement by Professor John Walker-Smith.
    Walker-Smith J
    Lancet; 2004 Mar; 363(9411):822-3. PubMed ID: 15022649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. All above board: openness is the only option if science is to maintain its integrity.
    New Sci; 2004 Mar 6-12; 181(2437):3. PubMed ID: 15139348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A statement by Dr Simon Murch. Allegations concerning our 1998 study.
    Murch S
    Lancet; 2004 Mar; 363(9411):821-2. PubMed ID: 15022648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MMR is but the tip of the iceberg.
    Green M
    BMJ; 2011 Dec; 343():d7889; author reply 7890. PubMed ID: 22146651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MMR controversy raises questions about publication ethics.
    Fleck F
    Bull World Health Organ; 2004 Apr; 82(4):311-2. PubMed ID: 15296362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A statement by Dr Andrew Wakefield.
    Wakefield A
    Lancet; 2004 Mar; 363(9411):823-4. PubMed ID: 15022650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MMR--responding to retraction.
    Wakefield AJ; Harvey P; Linnell J
    Lancet; 2004 Apr; 363(9417):1327-8; discussion 1328. PubMed ID: 15094289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The lessons of MMR.
    Horton R
    Lancet; 2004 Mar; 363(9411):747-9. PubMed ID: 15016482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anatomy of a scare.
    Begley S
    Newsweek; 2009 Mar; 153(9):42-7. PubMed ID: 19413010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Secrets of the MMR scare . How the vaccine crisis was meant to make money.
    Deer B
    BMJ; 2011 Jan; 342():c5258. PubMed ID: 21224310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MMR scare. In the wake of Wakefield.
    Bates T
    BMJ; 2011 Feb; 342():d806. PubMed ID: 21303891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The story behind autism and the MMR vaccine: a medical scandal in the news].
    Saint-Laurent F
    Perspect Infirm; 2011; 8(5):9. PubMed ID: 21939085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Truth and health consequences.
    Ratzan SC
    J Health Commun; 2004; 9(4):279-80. PubMed ID: 15371082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.