215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16864665)
1. Long-term risk of false-positive screening results and subsequent biopsy as a function of mammography use.
Blanchard K; Colbert JA; Kopans DB; Moore R; Halpern EF; Hughes KS; Smith BL; Tanabe KK; Michaelson JS
Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):335-42. PubMed ID: 16864665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk of Breast Cancer in Women with False-Positive Results according to Mammographic Features.
Castells X; Torá-Rocamora I; Posso M; Román M; Vernet-Tomas M; Rodríguez-Arana A; Domingo L; Vidal C; Baré M; Ferrer J; Quintana MJ; Sánchez M; Natal C; Espinàs JA; Saladié F; Sala M;
Radiology; 2016 Aug; 280(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 26878225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Abraham LA; Lehman CD; Yankaskas BC; Ballard-Barbash R; Barlow WE; Voeks JH; Geller BM; Carney PA; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):684-92. PubMed ID: 15734926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The cumulative risk of false-positive results in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program: updated results.
Roman M; Hubbard RA; Sebuodegard S; Miglioretti DL; Castells X; Hofvind S
Cancer; 2013 Nov; 119(22):3952-8. PubMed ID: 23963877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interval Breast Cancer Rates and Histopathologic Tumor Characteristics after False-Positive Findings at Mammography in a Population-based Screening Program.
Hofvind S; Sagstad S; Sebuødegård S; Chen Y; Roman M; Lee CI
Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 29239711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do mammographic technologists affect radiologists' diagnostic mammography interpretative performance?
Henderson LM; Benefield T; Bowling JM; Durham DD; Marsh MW; Schroeder BF; Yankaskas BC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):903-8. PubMed ID: 25794085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Supplemental Screening Breast US in Women with Negative Mammographic Findings: Effect of Routine Axillary Scanning.
Lee SH; Yi A; Jang MJ; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK
Radiology; 2018 Mar; 286(3):830-837. PubMed ID: 29083988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of false-positive mammography on subsequent screening attendance and risk of cancer.
McCann J; Stockton D; Godward S
Breast Cancer Res; 2002; 4(5):R11. PubMed ID: 12223128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduction in false-positive results after introduction of digital mammography: analysis from four population-based breast cancer screening programs in Spain.
Sala M; Salas D; Belvis F; Sánchez M; Ferrer J; Ibañez J; Román R; Ferrer F; Vega A; Laso MS; Castells X
Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):388-95. PubMed ID: 21273520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.
Elmore JG; Barton MB; Moceri VM; Polk S; Arena PJ; Fletcher SW
N Engl J Med; 1998 Apr; 338(16):1089-96. PubMed ID: 9545356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. False-positive results in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review and survey of service screening programmes.
Hofvind S; Ponti A; Patnick J; Ascunce N; Njor S; Broeders M; Giordano L; Frigerio A; Törnberg S; ; Van Hal G; Martens P; Májek O; Danes J; von Euler-Chelpin M; Aasmaa A; Anttila A; Becker N; Péntek Z; Budai A; Mádai S; Fitzpatrick P; Mooney T; Zappa M; Ventura L; Scharpantgen A; Hofvind S; Seroczynski P; Morais A; Rodrigues V; Bento MJ; Gomes de Carvalho J; Natal C; Prieto M; Sánchez-Contador Escudero C; Zubizarreta Alberti R; Fernández Llanes SB; Ascunce N; Ederra Sanza M; Sarriugarte Irigoien G; Salas Trejo D; Ibáñez Cabanell J; Wiege M; Ohlsson G; Törnberg S; Korzeniewska M; de Wolf C; Fracheboud J; Patnick J; Lancucki L; Ducarroz S; Suonio E
J Med Screen; 2012; 19 Suppl 1():57-66. PubMed ID: 22972811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography.
Laya MB; Larson EB; Taplin SH; White E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1996 May; 88(10):643-9. PubMed ID: 8627640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical and radiological features of breast tumors according to history of false-positive results in mammography screening.
Domingo L; Romero A; Blanch J; Salas D; Sánchez M; Rodríguez-Arana A; Ferrer J; Ibáñez J; Vega A; Laso MS; Castells X; Sala M
Cancer Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 37(5):660-5. PubMed ID: 23962702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer detection with short-interval follow-up compared with return to annual screening in patients with benign stereotactic or US-guided breast biopsy results.
Johnson JM; Johnson AK; O'Meara ES; Miglioretti DL; Geller BM; Hotaling EN; Herschorn SD
Radiology; 2015 Apr; 275(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 25423143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; de Koning HJ; Coebergh JW; van Beek M; Hooijen MJ; van de Poll-Franse LV
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):774-81. PubMed ID: 19046632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Association between mammography timing and measures of screening performance in the United States.
Yankaskas BC; Taplin SH; Ichikawa L; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Carney PA; Kerlikowske K; Ballard-Barbash R; Cutter GR; Barlow WE
Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):363-73. PubMed ID: 15670994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
