126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16866003)
1. Word recognition of digit triplets and monosyllabic words in multitalker babble by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
Wilson RH; Burks CA; Weakley DG
J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):385-97. PubMed ID: 16866003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
Wilson RH; Cates WB
J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(7):548-56. PubMed ID: 19248731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of word-recognition abilities assessed with digit pairs and digit triplets in multitalker babble.
Wilson RH; Burks CA; Weakley DG
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(4):499-510. PubMed ID: 16320145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The 500 Hz masking-level difference and word recognition in multitalker babble for 40- to 89-year-old listeners with symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss.
Wilson RH; Weakley DG
J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Jun; 16(6):367-82. PubMed ID: 16178408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN), list 3: a practice list.
Wilson RH; Watts KL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Feb; 23(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 22353677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Word recognition in multitalker babble measured with two psychophysical methods.
Wilson RH; Burks CA; Weakley DG
J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Sep; 16(8):622-30. PubMed ID: 16295249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
Wilson RH; Trivette CP; Williams DA; Watts KL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):522-33. PubMed ID: 22992259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A word-recognition task in multitalker babble using a descending presentation mode from 24 dB to 0 dB signal to babble.
Wilson RH; Abrams HB; Pillion AL
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2003; 40(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 15074443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech recognition in multitalker babble using digits, words, and sentences.
McArdle RA; Wilson RH; Burks CA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Oct; 16(9):726-39; quiz 763-4. PubMed ID: 16515143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.
Wilson RH; McArdle R; Roberts H
J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):496-506. PubMed ID: 19253782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interrupted Monosyllabic Words: The Effects of Ten Interruption Locations on Recognition Performance by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Wilson RH; Sharrett KC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 28054913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a speech-in-multitalker-babble paradigm to assess word-recognition performance.
Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2003 Nov; 14(9):453-70. PubMed ID: 14708835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.
Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):370-395. PubMed ID: 30969910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Normal and hearing-impaired word recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and noise.
Beattie RC; Barr T; Roup C
Br J Audiol; 1997 Jun; 31(3):153-64. PubMed ID: 9276098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
Grant KW; Walden TC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of 35 words for evaluation of hearing loss in signal-to-babble ratio: A clinic protocol.
Wilson RH; Burks CA
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(6):839-52. PubMed ID: 16680621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Amos NE; Humes LE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
