These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16866598)

  • 21. Contamination vs. harm-relevant outcome expectancies and covariation bias in spider phobia.
    de Jong PJ; Peters ML
    Behav Res Ther; 2007 Jun; 45(6):1271-84. PubMed ID: 17097047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Never mind the spider: late positive potentials to phobic threat at fixation are unaffected by perceptual load.
    Norberg J; Peira N; Wiens S
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Nov; 47(6):1151-8. PubMed ID: 20409014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of fear and expectancies in capture of covert attention by spiders.
    Devue C; Belopolsky AV; Theeuwes J
    Emotion; 2011 Aug; 11(4):768-75. PubMed ID: 21604868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Some animal specific fears are more specific than others: Evidence from attention and emotion measures.
    Soares SC; Esteves F; Lundqvist D; Ohman A
    Behav Res Ther; 2009 Dec; 47(12):1032-42. PubMed ID: 19695561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Differential UCS expectancy bias in spider fearful individuals: evidence toward an association between spiders and disgust-relevant outcomes.
    van Overveld M; de Jong PJ; Peters ML
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2006 Mar; 37(1):60-72. PubMed ID: 16226218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contamination and harm relevant UCS-expectancy bias in spider phobic individuals: influence of treatment.
    van Overveld M; de Jong PJ; Huijding J; Peters ML
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2010; 17(6):510-8. PubMed ID: 20146198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Specific predictive power of automatic spider-related affective associations for controllable and uncontrollable fear responses toward spiders.
    Huijding J; de Jong PJ
    Behav Res Ther; 2006 Feb; 44(2):161-76. PubMed ID: 16389059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fear-relevant change detection in spider-fearful and non-fearful participants.
    Mayer B; Muris P; Vogel L; Nojoredjo I; Merckelbach H
    J Anxiety Disord; 2006; 20(4):510-9. PubMed ID: 15955657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Event-related potentials when identifying or color-naming threatening schematic stimuli in spider phobic and non-phobic individuals.
    Kolassa IT; Musial F; Kolassa S; Miltner WH
    BMC Psychiatry; 2006 Sep; 6():38. PubMed ID: 16981991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Automatic processing in spider phobia: implicit fear associations over the course of treatment.
    Teachman BA; Woody SR
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2003 Feb; 112(1):100-9. PubMed ID: 12653418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hypervigilance-avoidance pattern in spider phobia.
    Pflugshaupt T; Mosimann UP; von Wartburg R; Schmitt W; Nyffeler T; Müri RM
    J Anxiety Disord; 2005; 19(1):105-16. PubMed ID: 15488370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fear is fast in phobic individuals: amygdala activation in response to fear-relevant stimuli.
    Larson CL; Schaefer HS; Siegle GJ; Jackson CA; Anderle MJ; Davidson RJ
    Biol Psychiatry; 2006 Aug; 60(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 16919528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An experimental demonstration that fear, but not disgust, is associated with return of fear in phobias.
    Edwards S; Salkovskis PM
    J Anxiety Disord; 2006; 20(1):58-71. PubMed ID: 16325114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual working memory and threat monitoring: Spider fearfuls show disorder-specific change detection.
    Reinecke A; Becker ES; Rinck M
    Behav Res Ther; 2010 Aug; 48(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 20537318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attentional bias to pictures of fear-relevant animals in a dot probe task.
    Lipp OV; Derakshan N
    Emotion; 2005 Sep; 5(3):365-9. PubMed ID: 16187873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. But what about the Empress of Racnoss? The allocation of attention to spiders and Doctor Who in a visual search task is predicted by fear and expertise.
    Purkis HM; Lester KJ; Field AP
    Emotion; 2011 Dec; 11(6):1484-8. PubMed ID: 21707142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When spiders appear suddenly: spider-phobic patients are distracted by task-irrelevant spiders.
    Gerdes AB; Alpers GW; Pauli P
    Behav Res Ther; 2008 Feb; 46(2):174-87. PubMed ID: 18154873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual presentation of phobic stimuli: amygdala activation via an extrageniculostriate pathway?
    Goossens L; Schruers K; Peeters R; Griez E; Sunaert S
    Psychiatry Res; 2007 Jul; 155(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 17499485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Spider fearful individuals attend to threat, then quickly avoid it: evidence from eye movements.
    Rinck M; Becker ES
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2006 May; 115(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 16737388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cognitive reappraisal of snake and spider pictures: An event-related potentials study.
    Langeslag SJE; van Strien JW
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Aug; 130():1-8. PubMed ID: 29859220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.