These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16866749)

  • 1. Visual attention and the semantics of space: beyond central and peripheral cues.
    Gibson BS; Kingstone A
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jul; 17(7):622-7. PubMed ID: 16866749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention.
    Logan GD
    Cogn Psychol; 1995 Apr; 28(2):103-74. PubMed ID: 7736720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Involuntary but not voluntary orienting contributes to a disengage deficit in visual neglect.
    Olk B; Hildebrandt H; Kingstone A
    Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1149-64. PubMed ID: 19733346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interactive activation in visual word recognition: constraints imposed by the joint effects of spatial attention and semantics.
    Stolz JA; Stevanovski B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1064-76. PubMed ID: 15584815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Thinking about the future moves attention to the right.
    Ouellet M; Santiago J; Funes MJ; Lupiáñez J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 20121292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Separate mechanisms recruited by exogenous and endogenous spatial cues: evidence from a spatial Stroop paradigm.
    Funes MJ; Lupiáñez J; Milliken B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):348-62. PubMed ID: 17469972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Orienting of attention with eye and arrow cues and the effect of overtraining.
    Guzzon D; Brignani D; Miniussi C; Marzi CA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 20421095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eye gaze does not produce reflexive shifts of attention: evidence from frontal-lobe damage.
    Vecera SP; Rizzo M
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(1):150-9. PubMed ID: 15922371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic attention orienting by social and symbolic cues activates different neural networks: an fMRI study.
    Hietanen JK; Nummenmaa L; Nyman MJ; Parkkola R; Hämäläinen H
    Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 33(1):406-13. PubMed ID: 16949306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does gaze direction really trigger a reflexive shift of spatial attention?
    Friesen CK; Moore C; Kingstone A
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Feb; 57(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 15629217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visuospatial attention is guided by both the symbolic value and the spatial proximity of selected arrows.
    Pratt J; Radulescu P; Guo RM; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1321-4. PubMed ID: 20873941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
    Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial attention triggered by eye gaze enhances and speeds up visual processing in upper and lower visual fields beyond early striate visual processing.
    Schuller AM; Rossion B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Nov; 116(11):2565-76. PubMed ID: 16221564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Symbolic control of visual attention: semantic constraints on the spatial distribution of attention.
    Gibson BS; Scheutz M; Davis GJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):363-74. PubMed ID: 19304625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gaze and arrow cueing of attention reveals individual differences along the autism spectrum as a function of target context.
    Bayliss AP; Tipper SP
    Br J Psychol; 2005 Feb; 96(Pt 1):95-114. PubMed ID: 15826326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Location and features of instructive spatial cues do not influence the time course of covert shifts of visual spatial attention.
    Müller MM
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Mar; 77(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 18083290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemispheric differences in attentional orienting by social cues.
    Greene DJ; Zaidel E
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 21093465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left human frontal eye fields eliminates the cost of invalid endogenous cues.
    Smith DT; Jackson SR; Rorden C
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(9):1288-96. PubMed ID: 15949513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural correlates of the spatial and expectancy components of endogenous and stimulus-driven orienting of attention in the Posner task.
    Doricchi F; Macci E; Silvetti M; Macaluso E
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Jul; 20(7):1574-85. PubMed ID: 19846472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Normal attention orienting but abnormal stimulus alerting and conflict effect in combined subtype of ADHD.
    Oberlin BG; Alford JL; Marrocco RT
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Nov; 165(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16213034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.