1129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16868510)
1. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.
Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined electroacoustic stimulation in conventional candidates for cochlear implantation.
James CJ; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Lenarz T; Mawman D; Ramos A; Ramsden R; Sterkers O
Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():57-62. PubMed ID: 17063012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why.
James C; Albegger K; Battmer R; Burdo S; Deggouj N; Deguine O; Dillier N; Gersdorff M; Laszig R; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Mondain M; Offeciers E; Macías AR; Ramsden R; Sterkers O; Von Wallenberg E; Weber B; Fraysse B
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 May; 125(5):481-91. PubMed ID: 16092537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim straight electrode in subjects with residual low-frequency hearing.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):e33-43. PubMed ID: 24556970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An evaluation of the preservation of residual hearing with the Nucleus Contour Advance electrode.
Garcia-Ibanez L; Macias AR; Morera C; Rodriguez MM; Szyfter W; Skarszynski H; Emamdjomeh H; Baumgartner WD
Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Jun; 129(6):651-64. PubMed ID: 18752086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation.
Balkany TJ; Connell SS; Hodges AV; Payne SL; Telischi FF; Eshraghi AA; Angeli SI; Germani R; Messiah S; Arheart KL
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1083-8. PubMed ID: 17130798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode.
Cosetti MK; Friedmann DR; Zhu BZ; Heman-Ackah SE; Fang Y; Keller RG; Shapiro WH; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 23449440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation Depending on the Angle of Insertion: Indication for Electric or Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
Helbig S; Adel Y; Leinung M; Stöver T; Baumann U; Weissgerber T
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):834-841. PubMed ID: 29912820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
Helbig S; Adel Y; Rader T; Stöver T; Baumann U
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):e353-9. PubMed ID: 27631659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA
Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Slim Modiolar Electrode Placement in Candidates for Electroacoustic Stimulation.
Kay-Rivest E; Winchester A; McMenomey SO; Jethanamest D; Roland JT; Friedmann DR
Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):566-571. PubMed ID: 36534657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acceptance and Benefits of Electro-Acoustic Stimulation for Conventional-Length Electrode Arrays.
Spitzer ER; Waltzman SB; Landsberger DM; Friedmann DR
Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 32721977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
