BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16868511)

  • 1. Changes of postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients: the short-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids.
    Paasche G; Bockel F; Tasche C; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):639-47. PubMed ID: 16868511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The long-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids on postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients.
    Paasche G; Tasche C; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Aug; 30(5):592-8. PubMed ID: 19546829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intra- and postoperative electrode impedance of the straight and Contour arrays of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: relation to T and C levels.
    van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):537-44. PubMed ID: 17005497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term evaluation of the effect of intracochlear steroid deposition on electrode impedance in cochlear implant patients.
    De Ceulaer G; Johnson S; Yperman M; Daemers K; Offeciers FE; O'Donoghue GM; Govaerts PJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Sep; 24(5):769-74. PubMed ID: 14501455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The Nucleus Double Array Cochlear Implant: a new concept in obliterated cochlea].
    Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Weber BP; Frohne C; Büchner A; Battmer RD; Parker J; von Wallenberg E
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Aug; 78(8):421-8. PubMed ID: 10488461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults.
    Aschendorff A; Kromeier J; Klenzner T; Laszig R
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):75S-79S. PubMed ID: 17496653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The "pull-back" technique for Nucleus 24 perimodiolar electrode insertion.
    Todt I; Basta D; Eisenschenk A; Ernst A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 May; 132(5):751-4. PubMed ID: 15886630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects.
    Battmer R; Pesch J; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz M; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):918-22. PubMed ID: 17006341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children.
    Wackym PA; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Reeder RM; Raulie JC
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 14709998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Results with the Contour cochlear implant in patients with cochlear otosclerosis].
    Jaekel K; Aschendorff A; Klenzner T; Laszig R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2004 Jul; 83(7):457-60. PubMed ID: 15257495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Results of partial deafness cochlear implantation using various electrode designs.
    Skarzyński H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Podskarbi-Fayette R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():39-45. PubMed ID: 19390174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural response thresholds in the Nucleus Contour cochlear implant before and after stylet removal.
    Tsuji RK; Goffi-Gomez MV; Peralta CO; Guedes MC; Magalhães AT; Neto RB; Bento RF
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Nov; 129(11):1330-6. PubMed ID: 19863333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical case study review: steroid-responsive change in electrode impedance.
    Wolfe J; Baker RS; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Feb; 34(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 23295725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term performance of transvenous, steroid-eluting, high impedance, passive-fixation ventricular pacing leads.
    Yeh KH; Wang CC; Wen MS; Chou CC; Yeh SJ; Wu D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Oct; 27(10):1399-404. PubMed ID: 15511249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The nucleus contour electrode array: an electrophysiological study.
    Pasanisi E; Vincenti V; Bacciu A; Guida M; Bacciu S
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Sep; 112(9):1653-6. PubMed ID: 12352681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intracochlear misdirected implantation of a cochlear implant.
    Tange RA; Grolman W; Maat A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):650-2. PubMed ID: 16720451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.