475 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16868784)
1. Is a collagen scaffold for a tissue engineered nucleus replacement capable of restoring disc height and stability in an animal model?
Wilke HJ; Heuer F; Neidlinger-Wilke C; Claes L
Eur Spine J; 2006 Aug; 15 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S433-8. PubMed ID: 16868784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nucleus replacement could get a new chance with annulus closure.
Zengerle L; Köhler A; Debout E; Hackenbroch C; Wilke HJ
Eur Spine J; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1733-1741. PubMed ID: 32333186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Total disc replacement using a tissue-engineered intervertebral disc in vivo: new animal model and initial results.
Gebhard H; Bowles R; Dyke J; Saleh T; Doty S; Bonassar L; Härtl R
Evid Based Spine Care J; 2010 Aug; 1(2):62-6. PubMed ID: 23637671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Regeneration of the intervertebral disc with nucleus pulposus cell-seeded collagen II/hyaluronan/chondroitin-6-sulfate tri-copolymer constructs in a rabbit disc degeneration model.
Huang B; Zhuang Y; Li CQ; Liu LT; Zhou Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(26):2252-9. PubMed ID: 21358466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of a prosthetic disc nucleus on the mobility and disc height of the L4-5 intervertebral disc postnucleotomy.
Wilke HJ; Kavanagh S; Neller S; Haid C; Claes LE
J Neurosurg; 2001 Oct; 95(2 Suppl):208-14. PubMed ID: 11599838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc.
Dooris AP; Goel VK; Grosland NM; Gilbertson LG; Wilder DG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(6):E122-9. PubMed ID: 11246394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hydrogels for nucleus replacement--facing the biomechanical challenge.
Reitmaier S; Wolfram U; Ignatius A; Wilke HJ; Gloria A; Martín-Martínez JM; Silva-Correia J; Miguel Oliveira J; Luís Reis R; Schmidt H
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Oct; 14():67-77. PubMed ID: 22963748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of nucleus replacement device properties on lumbar spine mechanics.
Rundell SA; Guerin HL; Auerbach JD; Kurtz SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(19):2022-32. PubMed ID: 19730210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fill of the nucleus cavity affects mechanical stability in compression, bending, and torsion of a spine segment, which has undergone nucleus replacement.
Arthur A; Cannella M; Keane M; Singhatat W; Vresilovic E; Marcolongo M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(11):1128-35. PubMed ID: 20473120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Translational challenges for the development of a novel nucleus pulposus substitute: Experimental results from biomechanical and in vivo studies.
Detiger SE; de Bakker JY; Emanuel KS; Schmitz M; Vergroesen PP; van der Veen AJ; Mazel C; Smit TH
J Biomater Appl; 2016 Feb; 30(7):983-94. PubMed ID: 26494611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical evaluation of conventional anulus fibrosus closure methods required for nucleus replacement. Laboratory investigation.
Heuer F; Ulrich S; Claes L; Wilke HJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2008 Sep; 9(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 18928230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of position and height of a mobile core type artificial disc on the biomechanical behaviour of the lumbar spine.
Rohlmann A; Zander T; Bock B; Bergmann G
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Feb; 222(2):229-39. PubMed ID: 18441758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The facet joint loading profile of a cervical intervertebral disc replacement incorporating a novel saddle-shaped articulation.
Stieber JR; Quirno M; Kang M; Valdevit A; Errico TJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Oct; 24(7):432-6. PubMed ID: 21336178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of controlled dynamic disc distraction on degenerated intervertebral discs: an in vivo study on the rabbit lumbar spine model.
Kroeber M; Unglaub F; Guehring T; Nerlich A; Hadi T; Lotz J; Carstens C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jan; 30(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 15644753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Numerical analysis of the influence of nucleus pulposus removal on the biomechanical behavior of a lumbar motion segment.
Huang J; Yan H; Jian F; Wang X; Li H
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(14):1516-24. PubMed ID: 24893132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An in vitro model of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Melnyk AD; Kingwell SP; Zhu Q; Chak JD; Cripton PA; Fisher CG; Dvorak MF; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(14):E870-7. PubMed ID: 23558441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of increasing implant height on lumbar spine kinematics and foraminal size using the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
Gaffey JL; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov ML; Havey RM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):1777-82. PubMed ID: 20700082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of soft tissue properties on spinal flexibility in scoliosis: biomechanical simulation of fulcrum bending.
Little JP; Adam CJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):E76-82. PubMed ID: 19139657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
