These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16869919)

  • 21. Comparison of expert instruction and computer-based video training in teaching fundamental surgical skills to medical students.
    Nousiainen M; Brydges R; Backstein D; Dubrowski A
    Surgery; 2008 Apr; 143(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 18374052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A faculty development program to train tutors to be discussion leaders rather than facilitators.
    Shields HM; Guss D; Somers SC; Kerfoot BP; Mandell BS; Travassos WJ; Ullman SM; Maroo S; Honan JP; Raymond LW; Goldberg EM; Leffler DA; Hayward JN; Pelletier SR; Carbo AR; Fishman LN; Nath BJ; Cohn MA; Hafler JP
    Acad Med; 2007 May; 82(5):486-92. PubMed ID: 17457073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Learning intimate examinations with simulated patients: the evaluation of medical students' performance.
    Hendrickx K; De Winter B; Tjalma W; Avonts D; Peeraer G; Wyndaele JJ
    Med Teach; 2009 Apr; 31(4):e139-47. PubMed ID: 19404886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Medical students' perceptions of peer feedback on an anatomy student-selected study module.
    Gukas ID; Miles S; Heylings DJ; Leinster SJ
    Med Teach; 2008; 30(8):812-4. PubMed ID: 18946825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Construct validity of an objective assessment method for laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing and knot tying.
    Van Sickle KR; Baghai M; Huang IP; Goldenberg A; Smith CD; Ritter EM
    Am J Surg; 2008 Jul; 196(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 18417086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pilot study of a 'RIME'-based tool for giving feedback in a multi-specialty longitudinal clerkship.
    DeWitt D; Carline J; Paauw D; Pangaro L
    Med Educ; 2008 Dec; 42(12):1205-9. PubMed ID: 19120951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Undergraduate medical students: who seeks formative feedback?
    Sinclair HK; Cleland JA
    Med Educ; 2007 Jun; 41(6):580-2. PubMed ID: 17518838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Learning spinal manipulation: the importance of augmented feedback relating to various kinetic parameters.
    Descarreaux M; Dugas C; Lalanne K; Vincelette M; Normand MC
    Spine J; 2006; 6(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 16517384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of rater selection on peer assessment among medical students.
    Lurie SJ; Nofziger AC; Meldrum S; Mooney C; Epstein RM
    Med Educ; 2006 Nov; 40(11):1088-97. PubMed ID: 17054618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of global rating scale and checklist scores in the validation of an evaluation tool to assess performance in the resuscitation of critically ill patients during simulated emergencies (abbreviated as "CRM simulator study IB").
    Kim J; Neilipovitz D; Cardinal P; Chiu M
    Simul Healthc; 2009; 4(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 19212245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of visual feedback on manipulation performance and patient ratings.
    Triano JJ; Scaringe J; Bougie J; Rogers C
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006 Jun; 29(5):378-85. PubMed ID: 16762666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Can student tutors act as examiners in an objective structured clinical examination?
    Chenot JF; Simmenroth-Nayda A; Koch A; Fischer T; Scherer M; Emmert B; Stanske B; Kochen MM; Himmel W
    Med Educ; 2007 Nov; 41(11):1032-8. PubMed ID: 17973763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Constructive feedback. A strategy to enhance learning].
    Alves de Lima AE
    Medicina (B Aires); 2008; 68(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 18416326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How do clinical clerkship students experience simulator-based teaching? A qualitative analysis.
    Takayesu JK; Farrell SE; Evans AJ; Sullivan JE; Pawlowski JB; Gordon JA
    Simul Healthc; 2006; 1(4):215-9. PubMed ID: 19088592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computer-aided feedback of surgical knot tying using optical tracking.
    Watson RA
    J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(3):306-10. PubMed ID: 22483129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Global clinical performance rating, reliability and validity in an undergraduate clerkship.
    Daelmans HE; van der Hem-Stokroos HH; Hoogenboom RJ; Scherpbier AJ; Stehouwer CD; van der Vleuten CP
    Neth J Med; 2005; 63(7):279-84. PubMed ID: 16093582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How do feedback and instructions affect the performance of a simulated surgical task?
    Lazarski MP; Susarla SM; Bennett NL; Seldin EB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jun; 65(6):1155-61. PubMed ID: 17517300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reliability and usefulness of clinical encounter cards for a third-year surgical clerkship.
    Richards ML; Paukert JL; Downing SM; Bordage G
    J Surg Res; 2007 Jun; 140(1):139-48. PubMed ID: 17418865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Can students differentiate between PBL tutors with different tutoring deficiencies?
    Dolmans DH; Janssen-Noordman A; Wolfhagen HA
    Med Teach; 2006 Sep; 28(6):e156-61. PubMed ID: 17074695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Peer-assisted learning: a novel approach to clinical skills learning for medical students.
    Field M; Burke JM; McAllister D; Lloyd DM
    Med Educ; 2007 Apr; 41(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 17430287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.