BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16871427)

  • 1. Checklist content on a standardized patient assessment: an ex post facto review.
    Boulet JR; van Zanten M; de Champlain A; Hawkins RE; Peitzman SJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 16871427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of item and rater characteristics on checklist recording: what should we look for?
    Huber P; Baroffio A; Chamot E; Herrmann F; Nendaz MR; Vu NV
    Med Educ; 2005 Aug; 39(8):852-8. PubMed ID: 16048628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Standardized patients: a new method to assess the clinical skills of physicians.
    Chalabian J; Dunnington G
    Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc; 1997; 2(4):174-7. PubMed ID: 9362616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of clinically discriminating, evidence-based checklist items on the reliability of scores from an Internal Medicine residency OSCE.
    Daniels VJ; Bordage G; Gierl MJ; Yudkowsky R
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2014 Oct; 19(4):497-506. PubMed ID: 24449122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A feasibility study comparing checklists and global rating forms to assess resident performance in clinical skills.
    Ringsted C; Østergaard D; Ravn L; Pedersen JA; Berlac PA; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Teach; 2003 Nov; 25(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 15369915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of a core competency checklist assessment in the emergency department: the Standardized Direct Observation Assessment Tool.
    Shayne P; Gallahue F; Rinnert S; Anderson CL; Hern G; Katz E;
    Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Jul; 13(7):727-32. PubMed ID: 16636361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of global rating scale and checklist scores in the validation of an evaluation tool to assess performance in the resuscitation of critically ill patients during simulated emergencies (abbreviated as "CRM simulator study IB").
    Kim J; Neilipovitz D; Cardinal P; Chiu M
    Simul Healthc; 2009; 4(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 19212245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of two standard-setting approaches in high-stakes clinical performance assessment using generalizability theory.
    Richter Lagha RA; Boscardin CK; May W; Fung CC
    Acad Med; 2012 Aug; 87(8):1077-82. PubMed ID: 22722349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Checklist agreement between standardized patients and faculty.
    Kopp KC; Johnson JA
    J Dent Educ; 1995 Aug; 59(8):824-9. PubMed ID: 7499599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the use of global rating scale with checklists for the assessment of central venous catheterization skills using simulation.
    Ma IW; Zalunardo N; Pachev G; Beran T; Brown M; Hatala R; McLaughlin K
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2012 Oct; 17(4):457-70. PubMed ID: 21877217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A model for integrated assessment of clinical competence.
    Panzarella KJ; Manyon AT
    J Allied Health; 2007; 36(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 17941410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constructing a validity argument for the mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise: a review of the research.
    Hawkins RE; Margolis MJ; Durning SJ; Norcini JJ
    Acad Med; 2010 Sep; 85(9):1453-61. PubMed ID: 20736673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between experience with standardized patient examinations and subsequent standardized patient examination performance: a potential problem with standardized patient exam validity.
    Talente G; Haist SA; Wilson JF
    Eval Health Prof; 2007 Mar; 30(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 17293609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using standardized patients to assess the interpersonal skills of physicians: six years' experience with a high-stakes certification examination.
    van Zanten M; Boulet JR; McKinley D
    Health Commun; 2007; 22(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 17967142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient-centered interviewing and student performance in a comprehensive clinical skills examination: is there an association?
    Rouf E; Chumley H; Dobbie A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Apr; 75(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 19013743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. First-year medical students' assessment of their own communication skills: a video-based, open-ended approach.
    Zick A; Granieri M; Makoul G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Oct; 68(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 17640843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prior experiences associated with residents' scores on a communication and interpersonal skill OSCE.
    Yudkowsky R; Downing SM; Ommert D
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Sep; 62(3):368-73. PubMed ID: 16603331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incorporating simulation-based objective structured clinical examination into the Israeli National Board Examination in Anesthesiology.
    Berkenstadt H; Ziv A; Gafni N; Sidi A
    Anesth Analg; 2006 Mar; 102(3):853-8. PubMed ID: 16492840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rater errors in a clinical skills assessment of medical students.
    Iramaneerat C; Yudkowsky R
    Eval Health Prof; 2007 Sep; 30(3):266-83. PubMed ID: 17693619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the head-to-toe physical examination skills of medical students.
    Yudkowsky R; Downing S; Klamen D; Valaski M; Eulenberg B; Popa M
    Med Teach; 2004 Aug; 26(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 15369880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.