These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16871428)

  • 1. Quantitative contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of peripheral arterial disease: a comparative study versus standard digital angiography.
    Pavlovic C; Futamatsu H; Angiolillo DJ; Guzman LA; Wilke N; Siragusa D; Wludyka P; Percy R; Northrup M; Bass TA; Costa MA
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2007 Apr; 23(2):225-32. PubMed ID: 16871428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic pitfalls in postinterventional intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography after recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusions.
    Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Kos S; Rasmus M; Jaeger K; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19031180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-resolution 3D contrast-enhanced MRA with parallel imaging techniques before endovascular interventional treatment of arterial stenosis.
    Lin J; Li D; Yan F
    Vasc Med; 2009 Nov; 14(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 19808715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.
    Mell M; Tefera G; Thornton F; Siepman D; Turnipseed W
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(3):543-8; discussion 548. PubMed ID: 17223303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unmasking pedal arteries in patients with critical ischemia using time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MRA.
    Langer S; Krämer N; Mommertz G; Koeppel TA; Jacobs MJ; Wazirie NA; Ocklenburg C; Spüntrup E
    J Vasc Surg; 2009 May; 49(5):1196-202. PubMed ID: 19394548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries with the blood pool agent Vasovist: initial results in comparison to intra-arterial DSA].
    Vogt FM; Herborn CU; Parsons EC; Kröger K; Barkhausen J; Goyen M
    Rofo; 2007 Apr; 179(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 17385136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MR angiography of the pedal arteries with gadobenate dimeglumine, a contrast agent with increased relaxivity, and comparison with selective intraarterial DSA.
    Kreitner KF; Kunz RP; Herber S; Martenstein S; Dorweiler B; Dueber C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 18058929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of semiautomated analysis of 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for detection and quantification of aortoiliac stenoses.
    de Vries M; de Koning PJ; de Haan MW; Kessels AG; Nelemans PJ; Nijenhuis RJ; Planken RN; Vasbinder GB; van Engelshoven JM; van der Geest RJ; Leiner T
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Aug; 40(8):495-503. PubMed ID: 16024987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Routine use of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.
    Deutschmann HA; Schoellnast H; Portugaller HR; Preidler KW; Reittner P; Tillich M; Pilger E; Szolar DH
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2006; 29(5):762-70. PubMed ID: 16625410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Value of single-dose contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in therapy indications in abdominal and iliac arteries.
    Schaefer PJ; Schaefer FK; Mueller-Huelsbeck S; Both M; Heller M; Jahnke T
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(3):376-82. PubMed ID: 17278036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of gadofosveset-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography for lower-extremity peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
    Grijalba FU; Esandi MC
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 20105092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: results of a phase III multicenter trial.
    Bui BT; Miller S; Mildenberger P; Sam A; Sheng R;
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1402-10. PubMed ID: 20512893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography findings prior to hemodialysis vascular access creation: a prospective analysis.
    Planken RN; Leiner T; Nijenhuis RJ; Duijm LE; Cuypers PW; Douwes-Draaijer P; Van Der Sande FM; Kessels AG; Tordoir JH
    J Vasc Access; 2008; 9(4):269-77. PubMed ID: 19085897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pedal angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease: first-pass i.v. contrast-enhanced MR angiography with blood pool contrast medium versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.
    Kos S; Reisinger C; Aschwanden M; Bongartz GM; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Mar; 192(3):775-84. PubMed ID: 19234277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.
    Timaran CH; Rosero EB; Valentine RJ; Modrall JG; Smith S; Clagett GP
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Hellmich M; Nijenhuis M; Lackner K; Gossmann A
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and duplex of the iliac arteries compared with intra-arterial pressure gradient measurements.
    Wikström J; Holmberg A; Johansson L; Löfberg AM; Smedby O; Karacagil S; Ahlström H
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2000 May; 19(5):516-23. PubMed ID: 10828234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraarterial MR angiography and DSA in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison.
    Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Bongartz G; Jaeger K; Heidecker HG; Thalhammer C; Schulte AC; Hashagen C; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):901-8. PubMed ID: 16641335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [First clinical results in a study of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with the 1.0 molar gadobutrol in peripheral arterial occlusive disease--comparison to intraarterial DSA].
    Schäfer FK; Schäfer PJ; Jahnke T; Walluscheck K; Priebe M; Hentsch A; Heller M; Brossmann J
    Rofo; 2003 Apr; 175(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 12677513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography from the distal aorta to the ankle joint with a step-by-step technique.
    Huber A; Heuck A; Baur A; Helmberger T; Waggershauser T; Billing A; Heiss M; Petsch R; Reiser M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Nov; 175(5):1291-8. PubMed ID: 11044026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.