These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16872083)

  • 1. Factors influencing the accuracy of biomechanical breast models.
    Tanner C; Schnabel JA; Hill DL; Hawkes DJ; Leach MO; Hose DR
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1758-69. PubMed ID: 16872083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A material sensitivity study on the accuracy of deformable organ registration using linear biomechanical models.
    Chi Y; Liang J; Yan D
    Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):421-33. PubMed ID: 16532950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-element methods: application to breast MR images.
    Schnabel JA; Tanner C; Castellano-Smith AD; Degenhard A; Leach MO; Hose DR; Hill DL; Hawkes DJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Feb; 22(2):238-47. PubMed ID: 12716000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward in vivo lung's tissue incompressibility characterization for tumor motion modeling in radiation therapy.
    Shirzadi Z; Sadeghi-Naini A; Samani A
    Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051902. PubMed ID: 23635272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative evaluation of free-form deformation registration for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
    Tanner C; Schnabel JA; Hill DL; Hawkes DJ; Degenhard A; Leach MO; Hose DR; Hall-Craggs MA; Usiskin SI
    Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17500454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast lesion co-localisation between X-ray and MR images using finite element modelling.
    Lee AW; Rajagopal V; Babarenda Gamage TP; Doyle AJ; Nielsen PM; Nash MP
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1256-64. PubMed ID: 23860392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical 3-D finite element modeling of the human breast using MRI data.
    Samani A; Bishop J; Yaffe MJ; Plewes DB
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Apr; 20(4):271-9. PubMed ID: 11370894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new validation method for X-ray mammogram registration algorithms using a projection model of breast X-ray compression.
    Hipwell JH; Tanner C; Crum WR; Schnabel JA; Hawkes DJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(9):1190-200. PubMed ID: 17896592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated finite-element analysis for deformable registration of prostate images.
    Crouch JR; Pizer SM; Chaney EL; Hu YC; Mageras GS; Zaider M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(10):1379-90. PubMed ID: 17948728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Technical note: A novel boundary condition using contact elements for finite element based deformable image registration.
    Zhang T; Orton NP; Mackie TR; Paliwal BR
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2412-5. PubMed ID: 15487720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical modeling constrained surface-based image registration for prostate MR guided TRUS biopsy.
    van de Ven WJ; Hu Y; Barentsz JO; Karssemeijer N; Barratt D; Huisman HJ
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2470-81. PubMed ID: 25979040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring the nonlinear elastic properties of tissue-like phantoms.
    Erkamp RQ; Skovoroda AR; Emelianov SY; O'Donnell M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Apr; 51(4):410-9. PubMed ID: 15139542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A finite-element approach for Young's modulus reconstruction.
    Zhu Y; Hall TJ; Jiang J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 22(7):890-901. PubMed ID: 12906243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physical Constraint Finite Element Model for Medical Image Registration.
    Zhang J; Wang J; Wang X; Gao X; Feng D
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140567. PubMed ID: 26495841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Elasticity reconstruction from displacement and confidence measures of a multi-compressed ultrasound RF sequence.
    Li J; Cui Y; Kadour M; Noble JA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Feb; 55(2):319-26. PubMed ID: 18334339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A finite-element method model of soft tissue response to impulsive acoustic radiation force.
    Palmeri ML; Sharma AC; Bouchard RR; Nightingale RW; Nightingale KR
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Oct; 52(10):1699-712. PubMed ID: 16382621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonlinear elasticity imaging: theory and phantom study.
    Erkamp RQ; Emelianov SY; Skovoroda AR; O'Donnell M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 May; 51(5):532-9. PubMed ID: 15217231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FEM-based evaluation of deformable image registration for radiation therapy.
    Zhong H; Peters T; Siebers JV
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4721-38. PubMed ID: 17671331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Registration of 3-D intraoperative MR images of the brain using a finite-element biomechanical model.
    Ferrant M; Nabavi A; Macq B; Jolesz FA; Kikinis R; Warfield SK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1384-97. PubMed ID: 11811838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic multimodal 2D/3D breast image registration using biomechanical FEM models and intensity-based optimization.
    Hopp T; Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Kreisel P; Kaiser WA; Gemmeke H; Ruiter NV
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Feb; 17(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 23265802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.