These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16872089)

  • 1. Consistency of absorbed dose to water measurements using 21 ion-chamber models following the AAPM TG51 and TG21 calibration protocols.
    Tailor RC; Hanson WF; Wells N; Ibbott GS
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1818-28. PubMed ID: 16872089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
    Tailor RC; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electron beam water calorimetry measurements to obtain beam quality conversion factors.
    Muir BR; Cojocaru CD; McEwen MR; Ross CK
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5433-5444. PubMed ID: 28688120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The calibration and use of plane-parallel ionization chambers for dosimetry of electron beams: an extension of the 1983 AAPM protocol report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 39.
    Almond PR; Attix FH; Humphries LJ; Kubo H; Nath R; Goetsch S; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1994 Aug; 21(8):1251-60. PubMed ID: 7799867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monte Carlo calculations of electron beam quality conversion factors for several ion chamber types.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111701. PubMed ID: 25370615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison and uncertainty evaluation of different calibration protocols and ionization chambers for low-energy surface brachytherapy dosimetry.
    Candela-Juan C; Vijande J; García-Martínez T; Niatsetski Y; Nauta G; Schuurman J; Ouhib Z; Ballester F; Perez-Calatayud J
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4954-64. PubMed ID: 26233221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing calibration methods of electron beams using plane-parallel chambers with absorbed-dose to water based protocols.
    Stewart KJ; Seuntjens JP
    Med Phys; 2002 Mar; 29(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 11929010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Absorbed-dose beam quality conversion factors for cylindrical chambers in high energy photon beams.
    Seuntjens JP; Ross CK; Shortt KR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2763-79. PubMed ID: 11190960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical calibration dosimetry in JSMP-01: measurements using plane-parallel ion chambers.].
    Araki F; Kumagai K; Yoshiura T; Oura H; Tachibana M; Moribe N; Tajima H; Yoshida A; Kido T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2005; 25(3):114-23. PubMed ID: 16373987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; de Patoul N; Denis JM; Tomsej M; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 May; 48(9):1091-107. PubMed ID: 12765324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ionization chamber dosimetry of proton beams using cylindrical and plane parallel chambers. Nw versus Nk ion chamber calibrations.
    Medin J; Andreo P; Grusell E; Mattsson O; Montelius A; Roos M
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Jul; 40(7):1161-76. PubMed ID: 7568375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency.
    Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
    Araki F; Kubo HD
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A modified formalism for electron beam reference dosimetry to improve the accuracy of linac output calibration.
    Muir BR
    Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(5):2267-2276. PubMed ID: 31985833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new approach to electron-beam reference dosimetry.
    Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1998 Mar; 25(3):310-20. PubMed ID: 9547498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beam quality conversion factors for parallel-plate ionization chambers in MV photon beams.
    Muir BR; McEwen MR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2012 Mar; 39(3):1618-31. PubMed ID: 22380394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technical Note: On the use of cylindrical ionization chambers for electron beam reference dosimetry.
    Muir BR; McEwen MR
    Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6641-6646. PubMed ID: 28913919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.