These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16873105)

  • 1. Preference reversals are diminished when gambles are presented as relative frequencies.
    Tunney RJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1516-23. PubMed ID: 16873105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gambles vs. quasi-realistic scenarios: expectations to find probability and risk-defusing information.
    Huber O; Huber OW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):222-36. PubMed ID: 17603987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The format in which uncertainty information is presented affects decision biases.
    Gottlieb DA; Weiss T; Chapman GB
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Mar; 18(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 17444921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. College students' awareness of irrational judgments on gambling tasks: a dual-process account.
    Amsel E; Close J; Sadler E; Klaczynski PA
    J Psychol; 2009 May; 143(3):293-317. PubMed ID: 19455857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Think different: the merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making.
    Dijksterhuis A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Nov; 87(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 15535773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of ambiguity and risk on decision making in mild Alzheimer's disease.
    Sinz H; Zamarian L; Benke T; Wenning GK; Delazer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2043-55. PubMed ID: 18339408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Normal aging affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk.
    Zamarian L; Sinz H; Bonatti E; Gamboz N; Delazer M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Sep; 22(5):645-57. PubMed ID: 18763884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of absolute risks, relative risks, frequencies, and probabilities on decision quality.
    Covey J
    J Health Commun; 2011 Aug; 16(7):788-801. PubMed ID: 21614719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of trial repetition and individual characteristics on decision making under uncertainty.
    Sasaki H; Kanachi M
    J Psychol; 2005 May; 139(3):233-46. PubMed ID: 15945518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of children's decision making: sensitivity to punishment frequency, not task complexity.
    Crone EA; Bunge SA; Latenstein H; van der Molen MW
    Child Neuropsychol; 2005 Jun; 11(3):245-63. PubMed ID: 16036450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the composition of risk preference and belief.
    Wakkar PP
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jan; 111(1):236-41. PubMed ID: 14756595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inferences under time pressure: how opportunity costs affect strategy selection.
    Rieskamp J; Hoffrage U
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):258-76. PubMed ID: 17640605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probability Distortion Depends on Choice Sequence in Rhesus Monkeys.
    Ferrari-Toniolo S; Bujold PM; Schultz W
    J Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 39(15):2915-2929. PubMed ID: 30705103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Melioration behaviour in the Harvard game is reduced by simplifying decision outcomes.
    Stillwell DJ; Tunney RJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2252-61. PubMed ID: 19382008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do individual differences in Iowa Gambling Task performance predict adaptive decision making for risky gains and losses?
    Weller JA; Levin IP; Bechara A
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2010 Feb; 32(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 19484643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exaggerated risk: prospect theory and probability weighting in risky choice.
    Kusev P; van Schaik P; Ayton P; Dent J; Chater N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1487-505. PubMed ID: 19857019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decision making in the short and long run: repeated gambles and rationality.
    Aloysius JA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 17535579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing preference reversals: The role of preference imprecision and nontransparent methods.
    Pinto-Prades JL; Sánchez-Martínez FI; Abellán-Perpiñán JM; Martínez-Pérez JE
    Health Econ; 2018 Aug; 27(8):1230-1246. PubMed ID: 29770524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feedback produces divergence from prospect theory in descriptive choice.
    Jessup RK; Bishara AJ; Busemeyer JR
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1015-22. PubMed ID: 19000212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An empirical assessment of the form of utility functions.
    Kirby KN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):461-76. PubMed ID: 21355669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.