These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16873110)

  • 1. Processing the noun phrase versus sentence coordination ambiguity: thematic information does not completely eliminate processing difficulty.
    Hoeks JC; Hendriks P; Vonk W; Brown CM; Hagoort P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1581-99. PubMed ID: 16873110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.
    Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are semantic and syntactic cues inducing the same processes in the identification of word order?
    Casado P; Martín-Loeches M; Muñoz F; Fernández-Frías C
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):526-43. PubMed ID: 16099364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The sentence-composition effect: processing of complex sentences depends on the configuration of common noun phrases versus unusual noun phrases.
    Johnson ML; Lowder MW; Gordon PC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):707-24. PubMed ID: 21767046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Constituent order and semantic parallelism in online comprehension: eye-tracking evidence from German.
    Knoeferle P; Crocker MW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2338-71. PubMed ID: 19418379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Processing coordinate structures in Chinese: evidence from eye movements.
    Qingrong C; Yan H
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e35517. PubMed ID: 22558163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses.
    Staub A
    Cognition; 2010 Jul; 116(1):71-86. PubMed ID: 20427040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eye-movements and ERPs reveal the time course of processing negation and remitting counterfactual worlds.
    Ferguson HJ; Sanford AJ; Leuthold H
    Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1236():113-25. PubMed ID: 18722356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of (in)transitivity on structure building and agreement.
    Burkhardt P; Fanselow G; Schlesewsky M
    Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 1163():100-10. PubMed ID: 17658495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Online processing of novel noun-noun compounds: eye movement evidence.
    Cohen AL; Staub A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):147-65. PubMed ID: 23697393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Case-marking in the parsing of complement sentences: evidence from eye movements.
    Traxler MJ; Pickering MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Nov; 49(4):991-1004. PubMed ID: 8962544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences.
    Kuperberg GR; Sitnikova T; Caplan D; Holcomb PJ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Jun; 17(1):117-29. PubMed ID: 12763198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The neural underpinnings of semantic ambiguity and anaphora.
    Dwivedi VD; Phillips NA; Einagel S; Baum SR
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1311():93-109. PubMed ID: 19837047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Thematic roles, markedness alignment and processing complexity.
    Lee Y; Kwon Y; Gordon PC
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2015 Jun; 44(3):317-36. PubMed ID: 25341491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Processing the universal quantifier during sentence comprehension: ERP evidence.
    Jiang X; Tan Y; Zhou X
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1799-815. PubMed ID: 19428412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Event-related potentials elicited during parsing of ambiguous relative clauses in Spanish.
    Carreiras M; Salillas E; Barber H
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Jun; 20(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 15130594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Limitations on the use of verb information during sentence comprehension.
    Kennison SM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Mar; 8(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 11340858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of sentential position on noun phrase structure priming.
    Melinger A; Cleland AA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Nov; 64(11):2211-35. PubMed ID: 21736436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.