These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16874271)

  • 1. "Who benefits from peer review? An analysis of the outcome of 100 requests for review by plastic and reconstructive surgery".
    Orbay H; Sensöz O
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Aug; 118(2):579-80; author reply 580-1. PubMed ID: 16874271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review: does it work?
    Nahai F
    Aesthet Surg J; 2010 Jan; 30(1):110-1. PubMed ID: 20442084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Making the most of peer review.
    Nat Nanotechnol; 2010 Aug; 5(8):553. PubMed ID: 20689520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When the blind lead the blind: In the pit of peer review.
    Rossdale PD
    Equine Vet J; 2010 May; 42(4):283. PubMed ID: 20525041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancing Ethics in Peer Review Process.
    Agoramoorthy G
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Dec; 108():975-976. PubMed ID: 29179421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A personal perspective of the peer review process for plastic publications.
    Freshwater MF
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 Feb; 64(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 21187271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of the journal impact factor: choosing the optimal source of peer-reviewed plastic surgery information.
    Rohrich RJ; Sullivan D
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Jun; 117(7):2495-8. PubMed ID: 16772962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beyond the language barrier.
    Umakantha N
    Nature; 1997 Feb; 385(6619):764. PubMed ID: 9039902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cosmetic surgery for children with Down syndrome: the cruelest cut of all?
    Suziedelis AK
    Health Care Ethics USA; 2003; 11(1):E1. PubMed ID: 16184692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medical aid for children of Latin America: reconstructive plastic surgery in developing countries.
    Geraghty TE; Towle DR; Hendrix KD
    Mo Med; 2003; 100(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 12664706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ghost- and guest-authored pharmaceutical industry-sponsored studies: abuse of academic integrity, the peer review system, and public trust.
    Flaherty DK
    Ann Pharmacother; 2013; 47(7-8):1081-3. PubMed ID: 23585648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of the journal impact factor: choosing the optimal source of peer-reviewed plastic surgery information.
    Al-Benna S; Clover J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Feb; 119(2):755-6. PubMed ID: 17230130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Research ethics II: Mentoring, collaboration, peer review, and data management and ownership.
    Horner J; Minifie FD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Feb; 54(1):S330-45. PubMed ID: 21081679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [From the Cochrane Library: the use of peer review is still under discussion].
    Stijntjes F; Veeken H
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(16):934-7. PubMed ID: 18561790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The importance of peer review.
    Wheeler HL; Wheeler WB
    J Agric Food Chem; 2006 Nov; 54(24):8983. PubMed ID: 17117781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Letter: Peer review of cosmetic surgeons.
    Smith TW
    Eye Ear Nose Throat Mon; 1976 Feb; 55(2):17. PubMed ID: 1245208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can peer review police fraud?
    Nat Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 9(2):149. PubMed ID: 16439975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review: universal, but valid?
    Sataloff RT
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2009 Apr; 88(4):848-51. PubMed ID: 19358120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The pitfalls and rewards of peer review.
    Lancet; 2008 Feb; 371(9611):447. PubMed ID: 18262020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Publishing: The peer-review scam.
    Ferguson C; Marcus A; Oransky I
    Nature; 2014 Nov; 515(7528):480-2. PubMed ID: 25428481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.