These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16874288)

  • 41. [Optimization of radiographic conditions for computed tomography (CT) during hepatic angiography by interventional radiology-CT angio system].
    Ohshima S; Sakamoto H; Kobayashi H; Sato K; Baba T; Aikawa Y; Sano Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1454-60. PubMed ID: 22104239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Review of dosimetry instrumentation in digital and interventional radiology.
    Toivonen M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):147-50. PubMed ID: 11487825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Performance of a 41 x 41 cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector designed for angiographic and R&F imaging applications.
    Granfors PR; Aufrichtig R; Possin GE; Giambattista BW; Huang ZS; Liu J; Ma B
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2715-26. PubMed ID: 14596310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
    Huda W; Ogden KM; Khorasani MR
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Radiation dose reduction in scoliosis patients: low-dose full-spine radiography with digital flat panel detector and image stitching system.
    Grieser T; Baldauf AQ; Ludwig K
    Rofo; 2011 Jul; 183(7):645-9. PubMed ID: 21614741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Measurement of check of entrance exposure dose rate of X-ray image intensifier-television with dose rate control (author's transl)].
    Klein J
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1981; 22(2):231-9. PubMed ID: 7255695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The value of digital personal dosemeters in angiography/interventional radiology: preliminary experience.
    Casey M; Malone DE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):93-4. PubMed ID: 11487851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. CdZnTe detector in mammographic x-ray spectroscopy.
    Miyajima S; Imagawa K
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Nov; 47(22):3959-72. PubMed ID: 12476976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Reduction of the radiation exposure of patients caused by selected interventional and angiographic procedures].
    Seifert H; el-Jamal A; Roth R; Urbanczyk K; Kramann B
    Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):1057-64. PubMed ID: 11199435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of entrance exposure and signal-to-noise ratio between an SBDX prototype and a wide-beam cardiac angiographic system.
    Speidel MA; Wilfley BP; Star-Lack JM; Heanue JA; Betts TD; Van Lysel MS
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2728-43. PubMed ID: 16964848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Dose-Decreasing Effect of the First Reversed Laser Beam Collimator for C-Arm Type Angiographic Equipment.
    Heo YC; Cho JH; Han DK
    J Korean Med Sci; 2017 Jul; 32(7):1083-1090. PubMed ID: 28581263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. 3-Dimensional rotational X-ray imaging, 3D-RX: image quality and patient dose simulation for optimisation studies.
    Kroon JN
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):341-9. PubMed ID: 15933134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A comparison of patient dose for examinations of the upper gastrointestinal tract at 11 conventional and digital X-ray units in The Netherlands.
    Geleijns J; Broerse JJ; Chandie Shaw MP; Schultz FW; Teeuwisse W; Van Unnik JG; Zoetelief J
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Jul; 71(847):745-53. PubMed ID: 9771385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Efficacy of a minicourse in radiation-reducing techniques in invasive cardiology: a multicenter field study.
    Kuon E; Weitmann K; Hoffmann W; Dörr M; Reffelmann T; Hummel A; Riad A; Busch MC; Empen K; Felix SB
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Apr; 7(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 24630883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Investigation of scatter fractions for estimating leakage dose in medical X-ray imaging facilities.
    Noto K; Koshida K; Iida H; Yamamoto T; Kobayashi I; Kawabata C
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2009 Jul; 2(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 20821112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Development of a front shield for a 3D positron emission tomograph].
    Yammoto S; Miura S; Shouji Y; Iida H; Kanno I
    Kaku Igaku; 1996 Jun; 33(6):641-6. PubMed ID: 8741509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. MANAGEMENT OF PATIENT DOSES FROM DIGITAL X-RAY CHEST SCREENING EXAMINATIONS.
    Vodovatov AV; Drozdov AA; Telnova AU; Bernhardsson C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):232-9. PubMed ID: 26769906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Changing from image intensifier to flat detector technology for interventional cardiology procedures: a practical point of view.
    Bokou C; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Breisch R; Beissel J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):83-6. PubMed ID: 18448437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [A urological x-ray study table with a 36-cm x-ray image intensifier].
    Melchior H; Lang G
    Urologe A; 1983 Jan; 22(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 6220504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Performance evaluation of two computed radiography systems and patient dose in pelvic examination.
    Elshiekh E; Suliman II; Habbani F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):392-6. PubMed ID: 25836691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.