278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16875232)
1. Pure-tone auditory stream segregation and speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients.
Hong RS; Turner CW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):360-74. PubMed ID: 16875232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptual organization of sequential stimuli in cochlear implant listeners: A temporal processing approach.
Saki N; Nikakhlagh S; Mirmomeni G; Bayat A
Int Tinnitus J; 2019 Jan; 23(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 31469526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Discrimination of Stochastic Frequency Modulation by Cochlear Implant Users.
Sheft S; Cheng MY; Shafiro V
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):572-81. PubMed ID: 26134724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Avoiding disconnection: An evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users.
Marcrum SC; Picou EM; Steffens T
Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27809627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test.
Kang R; Nimmons GL; Drennan W; Longnion J; Ruffin C; Nie K; Won JH; Worman T; Yueh B; Rubinstein J
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 19474735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users.
Won JH; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 8(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 17587137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech perception comparisons using an implanted and an external microphone in existing cochlear implant users.
Jenkins HA; Uhler K
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jan; 33(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 22158017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sequential stream segregation in normally-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
Tejani VD; Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Chatterjee M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):50. PubMed ID: 28147600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative functional assessment of auditory cortex in adult cochlear implant users.
Roland PS; Tobey EA; Devous MD
Laryngoscope; 2001 Jan; 111(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 11192903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frequency change detection and speech perception in cochlear implant users.
Zhang F; Underwood G; McGuire K; Liang C; Moore DR; Fu QJ
Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 379():12-20. PubMed ID: 31035223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spectral and temporal measures in hybrid cochlear implant users: on the mechanism of electroacoustic hearing benefits.
Golub JS; Won JH; Drennan WR; Worman TD; Rubinstein JT
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Feb; 33(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 22215451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
