208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16875308)
1. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of respiratory-triggered three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo with parallel imaging technique and breath-hold half-Fourier two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo technique.
Masui T; Katayama M; Kobayashi S; Nozaki A; Sugimura M; Ikeda M; Sakahara H
Radiat Med; 2006 Apr; 24(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 16875308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How reliable is MRCP with an SS-FSE sequence at 3.0 T: comparison between SS-FSE BH and 3D-FSE BH ASSET sequences.
Lavdas E; Vlychou M; Arikidis N; Kapsalaki E; Roka V; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis I; Vassiou K
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(4):697-703. PubMed ID: 23522790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo MRCP: comparison with two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo techniques.
Sodickson A; Mortele KJ; Barish MA; Zou KH; Thibodeau S; Tempany CM
Radiology; 2006 Feb; 238(2):549-59. PubMed ID: 16436816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2D single-shot fast spin-echo and 3D fast spin-echo sequences.
Cova M; Stacul F; Cester G; Ukmar M; Pozzi Mucelli R
Radiol Med; 2003 Sep; 106(3):178-90. PubMed ID: 14612839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of respiratory-triggered 3-D fast spin-echo and single-shot fast spin-echo radial slab MR cholangiopancreatography images in children.
Chavhan GB; Almehdar A; Moineddin R; Gupta S; Babyn PS
Pediatr Radiol; 2013 Sep; 43(9):1086-92. PubMed ID: 23508707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3T in a single breath-hold: comparative effectiveness between three-dimensional (3D) gradient- and spin-echo and two-dimensional (2D) thick-slab fast spin-echo acquisitions.
Chien CP; Chiu FM; Shen YC; Chen YH; Chung HW
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2020 Jun; 10(6):1265-1274. PubMed ID: 32550135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. GRASE Revisited: breath-hold three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using a Gradient and Spin Echo (GRASE) technique at 3T.
Nam JG; Lee JM; Kang HJ; Lee SM; Kim E; Peeters JM; Yoon JH
Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3721-3728. PubMed ID: 29392471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison between half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo and two-dimensional turbo spin-echo pulse sequences.
Kim TK; Han JK; Kim SJ; Bae SH; Choi BI
Abdom Imaging; 1998; 23(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 9663276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Usefulness of the Short-Echo Time Cube Sequence at 3-T Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography: Prospective Comparison With the Conventional 3-Dimensional Fast Spin-Echo Sequence.
Itatani R; Namimoto T; Kusunoki S; Mizuguchi T; Ohtsuka S; Yamashita Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(4):551-6. PubMed ID: 26966952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improvement of MR cholangiopancreatography at .5 T: three-dimensional half-averaged single-shot fast spin echo with multi-breath-hold technique.
Ichikawa T; Haradome H; Hanaoka H; Kassai Y; Nitatori T; Hachiya J; Araki T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1998; 8(2):459-66. PubMed ID: 9562076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Another dimension in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.
Yoon LS; Catalano OA; Fritz S; Ferrone CR; Hahn PF; Sahani DV
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 19478628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the biliary and pancreatic system with 2D SSFSE, breathhold 3D FRFSE and respiratory-triggered 3D FRFSE sequences.
Palmucci S; Mauro LA; Coppolino M; Musumeci AG; Foti PV; Milone P; Ettorre GC
Radiol Med; 2010 Apr; 115(3):467-82. PubMed ID: 20077045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparisons between image quality and diagnostic performance of 2D- and breath-hold 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3T.
Yoen H; Lee JM; Lee SM; Kang HJ; Bae JS; Kim E; Peeters JM; Yoon JH
Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8399-8407. PubMed ID: 33884471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3 Tesla: Image quality comparison between 3D compressed sensing and 2D single-shot acquisitions.
Lohöfer FK; Kaissis GA; Rasper M; Katemann C; Hock A; Peeters JM; Schlag C; Rummeny EJ; Karampinos D; Braren RF
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jun; 115():53-58. PubMed ID: 31084759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid 3D breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography using deep learning-constrained compressed sensing reconstruction.
Zhang Y; Peng W; Xiao Y; Ming Y; Ma K; Hu S; Zeng W; Zeng L; Liang Z; Zhang X; Xia C; Li Z
Eur Radiol; 2023 Apr; 33(4):2500-2509. PubMed ID: 36355200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using optimized integrated combination with parallel imaging and compressed sensing technique.
Nagata S; Goshima S; Noda Y; Kawai N; Kajita K; Kawada H; Tanahashi Y; Matsuo M
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 May; 44(5):1766-1772. PubMed ID: 30659308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Isotropic 3D T2-weighted MR cholangiopancreatography with parallel imaging: feasibility study.
Zhang J; Israel GM; Hecht EM; Krinsky GA; Babb JS; Lee VS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1564-70. PubMed ID: 17114551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical impact of 3-dimensional balanced turbo-field-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3 T: prospective intraindividual comparison with 3-dimensional turbo-spin-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
Itatani R; Namimoto T; Takaoka H; Katahira K; Noda S; Toyonari N; Yamashita Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25299796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using T2 preparation pulse: quantitative and qualitative analyses.
Ihara R; Oura D; Ichimura W; Kobayashi K
Acta Radiol; 2023 Dec; 64(12):2969-2976. PubMed ID: 37807657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MRCP imaging at 3.0 T vs. 1.5 T: preliminary experience in healthy volunteers.
Isoda H; Kataoka M; Maetani Y; Kido A; Umeoka S; Tamai K; Koyama T; Nakamoto Y; Miki Y; Saga T; Togashi K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 May; 25(5):1000-6. PubMed ID: 17410562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
