142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16875717)
21. Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy.
Gage JC; Hanson VW; Abbey K; Dippery S; Gardner S; Kubota J; Schiffman M; Solomon D; Jeronimo J;
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 108(2):264-72. PubMed ID: 16880294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Agreement between colposcopy results using the Reid Colposcopic Index and histopathology.
Kaban I; Cengiz H; Kaban A; Yildiz S; Ekin M; Avci E
Ginekol Pol; 2015 Jul; 86(7):537-40. PubMed ID: 26376533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience.
Economos K; Perez Veridiano N; Delke I; Collado ML; Tancer ML
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):915-8. PubMed ID: 8497355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Interobserver agreement for colposcopy quality control using digitized colposcopic images during the ALTS trial.
Ferris DG; Litaker M;
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Jan; 9(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 15870519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy of physician and nurse practitioner colposcopy to effect improved surveillance of cervical cancer.
Kilic G; England J; Borahay M; Pedraza D; Freeman D; Snyder R; Ertan AK
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2012; 33(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 22611960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An analysis of 84244 patients from the British Columbia cytology-colposcopy program.
Benedet JL; Matisic JP; Bertrand MA
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jan; 92(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 14751148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Computerized colposcopy: results of a pilot study and analysis of its clinical relevance.
Cristoforoni PM; Gerbaldo D; Perino A; Piccoli R; Montz FJ; Capitanio GL
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 85(6):1011-6. PubMed ID: 7770246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The role of colposcopy in modern gynecology.
Dexeus S; Cararach M; Dexeus D
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2002; 23(4):269-77. PubMed ID: 12214721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Key Determinants of the Value of Random Cervical Biopsy at Colposcopy.
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Burchette RJ; Wu R; Qiao YL
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Oct; 23(4):241-247. PubMed ID: 31592970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. 'See and treat' electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone.
Ferris DG; Hainer BL; Pfenninger JL; Zuber TJ
J Fam Pract; 1996 Mar; 42(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 8636676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Colposcopic proficiency-disease spectrum in a single family practice colposcopists' clinic.
Brotzman GL; Schellhase KG
WMJ; 2004; 103(7):61-5. PubMed ID: 15696836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Correlation between Reid's colposcopic index and histologic results from colposcopically directed biopsy in differentiating high-grade from low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion at Rajavithi Hospital.
Boonlikit S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Mar; 94 Suppl 2():S59-65. PubMed ID: 21717880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Colposcopy quality control by remote review of digitized colposcopic images.
Ferris DG; Litaker MS;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 191(6):1934-41. PubMed ID: 15592275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Colposcopy of the vagina--a frequently omitted part of the colposcopic examination].
Rokita W; Stanisławska M; Kulig B
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):699-703. PubMed ID: 20973207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. How can the incidence of negative specimens resulting from large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone (LLETZ) be reduced? An analysis of negative LLETZ specimens and development of a predictive model.
Howells RE; O'Mahony F; Tucker H; Millinship J; Jones PW; Redman CW
BJOG; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1075-82. PubMed ID: 11002948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reid Colposcopic Index Evaluation: Comparison of General and Oncologic Gynecologists.
Aue-Aungkul A; Suprasert P
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(12):5001-4. PubMed ID: 26163630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Objective perspective in colposcopy.
Nazeer S; Shafi MI
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Oct; 25(5):631-40. PubMed ID: 21839686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Analysis of the agreement between colposcopic impression and histopathological diagnosis of cervical biopsy in a single tertiary center of Chengdu.
Li J; Wang W; Yang P; Chen J; Dai Q; Hua P; Liu D
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Oct; 304(4):1033-1041. PubMed ID: 33683424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. "See-and-treat" loop electrosurgical excision. Has the time come for a reassessment?
Irvin WP; Andersen WA; Taylor PT; Stoler MH; Rice LW
J Reprod Med; 2002 Jul; 47(7):569-74. PubMed ID: 12170535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of colposcopic skills in an obstetrics and gynecology residency training program.
Toglia MR; Coburn KM; Pearl ML
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 1997 Jan; 1(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 25950776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
