These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16876778)
1. Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue. Branigan HP; Pickering MJ; McLean JF; Cleland AA Cognition; 2007 Aug; 104(2):163-97. PubMed ID: 16876778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: for the speaker or for the addressee? Kraljic T; Brennan SE Cogn Psychol; 2005 Mar; 50(2):194-231. PubMed ID: 15680144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do speakers avoid ambiguities during dialogue? Haywood SL; Pickering MJ; Branigan HP Psychol Sci; 2005 May; 16(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 15869694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How do speakers avoid ambiguous linguistic expressions? Ferreira VS; Slevc LR; Rogers ES Cognition; 2005 Jul; 96(3):263-84. PubMed ID: 15996561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground. Barr DJ Cognition; 2008 Oct; 109(1):18-40. PubMed ID: 18760407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does Syntactic Alignment Effectively Influence How Speakers Are Perceived by Their Conversation Partner? Schoot L; Heyselaar E; Hagoort P; Segaert K PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153521. PubMed ID: 27081856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The nature of words in human protolanguages: it's not a holophrastic-atomic meanings dichotomy. Dowman M Artif Life; 2008; 14(4):445-65. PubMed ID: 18573066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speakers Align With Their Partner's Overspecification During Interaction. Loy JE; Smith K Cogn Sci; 2021 Dec; 45(12):e13065. PubMed ID: 34913502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Young German children's early syntactic competence: a preferential looking study. Dittmar M; Abbot-Smith K; Lieven E; Tomasello M Dev Sci; 2008 Jul; 11(4):575-82. PubMed ID: 18576965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. You said it before and you'll say it again: expectations of consistency in communication. Shintel H; Keysar B J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):357-69. PubMed ID: 17352617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Effects of knowledge acquisition on verbal linearization about spatial orientation]. Buhl HM; Katz S; Schweizer K; Herrmann T Z Exp Psychol; 2000; 47(1):17-33. PubMed ID: 10676138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perspective-Taking in Referential Communication: Does Stimulated Attention to Addressees' Perspective Influence Speakers' Reference Production? Damen D; van der Wijst P; van Amelsvoort M; Krahmer E J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Apr; 48(2):257-288. PubMed ID: 30219958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A communication-theory based view on telemedical communication. Schall T; Roeckelein W; Mohr M; Kampshoff J; Lange T; Nerlich M Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 97():115-30. PubMed ID: 15537236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The cortical dynamics in building syntactic structures of sentences: an MEG study in a minimal-pair paradigm. Iijima K; Fukui N; Sakai KL Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(4):1387-96. PubMed ID: 19041723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Give and take: syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension. Thothathiri M; Snedeker J Cognition; 2008 Jul; 108(1):51-68. PubMed ID: 18258226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Countertransference examples of the syntactic expression of warded-off contents. Dahl H; Teller V; Moss D; Trujillo M Psychoanal Q; 1978; 47(3):339-63. PubMed ID: 684128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interpreting what speakers say and implicate. Gibbs RW Brain Lang; 1999 Jul; 68(3):466-85. PubMed ID: 10441189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]