These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16876778)

  • 1. Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue.
    Branigan HP; Pickering MJ; McLean JF; Cleland AA
    Cognition; 2007 Aug; 104(2):163-97. PubMed ID: 16876778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: for the speaker or for the addressee?
    Kraljic T; Brennan SE
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Mar; 50(2):194-231. PubMed ID: 15680144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do speakers avoid ambiguities during dialogue?
    Haywood SL; Pickering MJ; Branigan HP
    Psychol Sci; 2005 May; 16(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 15869694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How do speakers avoid ambiguous linguistic expressions?
    Ferreira VS; Slevc LR; Rogers ES
    Cognition; 2005 Jul; 96(3):263-84. PubMed ID: 15996561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue.
    Branigan HP; Pickering MJ; Cleland AA
    Cognition; 2000 May; 75(2):B13-25. PubMed ID: 10771277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground.
    Barr DJ
    Cognition; 2008 Oct; 109(1):18-40. PubMed ID: 18760407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does Syntactic Alignment Effectively Influence How Speakers Are Perceived by Their Conversation Partner?
    Schoot L; Heyselaar E; Hagoort P; Segaert K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153521. PubMed ID: 27081856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The nature of words in human protolanguages: it's not a holophrastic-atomic meanings dichotomy.
    Dowman M
    Artif Life; 2008; 14(4):445-65. PubMed ID: 18573066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lexically-driven syntactic priming.
    Melinger A; Dobel C
    Cognition; 2005 Nov; 98(1):B11-20. PubMed ID: 15925357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speakers Align With Their Partner's Overspecification During Interaction.
    Loy JE; Smith K
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Dec; 45(12):e13065. PubMed ID: 34913502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Young German children's early syntactic competence: a preferential looking study.
    Dittmar M; Abbot-Smith K; Lieven E; Tomasello M
    Dev Sci; 2008 Jul; 11(4):575-82. PubMed ID: 18576965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. You said it before and you'll say it again: expectations of consistency in communication.
    Shintel H; Keysar B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):357-69. PubMed ID: 17352617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effects of knowledge acquisition on verbal linearization about spatial orientation].
    Buhl HM; Katz S; Schweizer K; Herrmann T
    Z Exp Psychol; 2000; 47(1):17-33. PubMed ID: 10676138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perspective-Taking in Referential Communication: Does Stimulated Attention to Addressees' Perspective Influence Speakers' Reference Production?
    Damen D; van der Wijst P; van Amelsvoort M; Krahmer E
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Apr; 48(2):257-288. PubMed ID: 30219958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pragmatics in discourse performance: insights from aphasiology.
    Ulatowska HK; Olness GS
    Semin Speech Lang; 2007 May; 28(2):148-58. PubMed ID: 17427053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A communication-theory based view on telemedical communication.
    Schall T; Roeckelein W; Mohr M; Kampshoff J; Lange T; Nerlich M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 97():115-30. PubMed ID: 15537236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cortical dynamics in building syntactic structures of sentences: an MEG study in a minimal-pair paradigm.
    Iijima K; Fukui N; Sakai KL
    Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(4):1387-96. PubMed ID: 19041723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Give and take: syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension.
    Thothathiri M; Snedeker J
    Cognition; 2008 Jul; 108(1):51-68. PubMed ID: 18258226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Countertransference examples of the syntactic expression of warded-off contents.
    Dahl H; Teller V; Moss D; Trujillo M
    Psychoanal Q; 1978; 47(3):339-63. PubMed ID: 684128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interpreting what speakers say and implicate.
    Gibbs RW
    Brain Lang; 1999 Jul; 68(3):466-85. PubMed ID: 10441189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.