BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16876892)

  • 21. Effect of inulin on the human gut microbiota: stimulation of Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii.
    Ramirez-Farias C; Slezak K; Fuller Z; Duncan A; Holtrop G; Louis P
    Br J Nutr; 2009 Feb; 101(4):541-50. PubMed ID: 18590586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An optimized enumeration method for sorbitol-fermenting Bifidobacteria in water samples.
    Long SC; Arango P C; Plummer JD
    Can J Microbiol; 2005 May; 51(5):413-22. PubMed ID: 16088337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multiplex PCR with 16S rRNA gene-targeted primers of bifidobacterium spp. to identify sources of fecal pollution.
    Bonjoch X; Ballesté E; Blanch AR
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2004 May; 70(5):3171-5. PubMed ID: 15128586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The persistence of bifidobacteria populations in a river measured by molecular and culture techniques.
    Bonjoch X; Lucena F; Blanch AR
    J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Oct; 107(4):1178-85. PubMed ID: 19486397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Human-specific fecal bacteria in wastewater treatment plant effluents.
    Wéry N; Monteil C; Pourcher AM; Godon JJ
    Water Res; 2010 Mar; 44(6):1873-83. PubMed ID: 19945729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Detection of infant faecal bifidobacteria by enzymatic methods.
    Vlková E; Nevoral J; Jencikova B; Kopecný J; Godefrooij J; Trojanová I; Rada V
    J Microbiol Methods; 2005 Mar; 60(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 15649538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of the PCR method for identification of Bifidobacterium species.
    Youn SY; Seo JM; Ji GE
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2008 Jan; 46(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 18086194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Detection and quantification of Bifidobacterium lactis LAFTI B94 in human faecal samples from a consumption trial.
    Su P; Henriksson A; Tandianus JE; Park JH; Foong F; Dunn NW
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2005 Mar; 244(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 15727827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Culture-independent analysis of fecal microbiota in infants, with special reference to Bifidobacterium species.
    Sakata S; Tonooka T; Ishizeki S; Takada M; Sakamoto M; Fukuyama M; Benno Y
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2005 Feb; 243(2):417-23. PubMed ID: 15686844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for quantitative detection of the human-specific enterococci surface protein marker in sewage and environmental waters.
    Ahmed W; Stewart J; Gardner T; Powell D
    Environ Microbiol; 2008 Dec; 10(12):3255-64. PubMed ID: 18707613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of pepper mild mottle virus, human picobirnavirus and Torque teno virus as indicators of fecal contamination in river water.
    Hamza IA; Jurzik L; Uberla K; Wilhelm M
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(3):1358-68. PubMed ID: 21074236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Characterization of fecal microbiota in cats using universal 16S rRNA gene and group-specific primers for Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium spp.
    Ritchie LE; Burke KF; Garcia-Mazcorro JF; Steiner JM; Suchodolski JS
    Vet Microbiol; 2010 Jul; 144(1-2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20092970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Identification of nonpoint sources of fecal pollution in coastal waters by using host-specific 16S ribosomal DNA genetic markers from fecal anaerobes.
    Bernhard AE; Field KG
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1587-94. PubMed ID: 10742246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Identification of human fecal pollution sources in a coastal area: a case study at Oostende (Belgium).
    Seurinck S; Verdievel M; Verstraete W; Siciliano SD
    J Water Health; 2006 Jun; 4(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 16813010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A PCR method for detection of bifidobacteria in raw milk and raw milk cheese: comparison with culture-based methods.
    Delcenserie V; Bechoux N; China B; Daube G; Gavini F
    J Microbiol Methods; 2005 Apr; 61(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 15676196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detection of genetic markers of fecal indicator bacteria in Lake Michigan and determination of their relationship to Escherichia coli densities using standard microbiological methods.
    Bower PA; Scopel CO; Jensen ET; Depas MM; McLellan SL
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2005 Dec; 71(12):8305-13. PubMed ID: 16332817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rapid QPCR-based assay for fecal Bacteroides spp. as a tool for assessing fecal contamination in recreational waters.
    Converse RR; Blackwood AD; Kirs M; Griffith JF; Noble RT
    Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4828-37. PubMed ID: 19631958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The detection of Bifidobacterium adolescentis by colony hybridization as an indicator of human faecal pollution.
    Lynch PA; Gilpin BJ; Sinton LW; Savill MG
    J Appl Microbiol; 2002; 92(3):526-33. PubMed ID: 11872129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Conditions affecting cell surface properties of human intestinal bifidobacteria.
    Canzi E; Guglielmetti S; Mora D; Tamagnini I; Parini C
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2005; 88(3-4):207-19. PubMed ID: 16284927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of Bifidobacterium dentium as an indicator of the origin of fecal water pollution.
    Nebra Y; Bonjoch X; Blanch AR
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2003 May; 69(5):2651-6. PubMed ID: 12732533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.