216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16876892)
41. Digoxigenin-labeled deoxyribonucleic acid probes for the enumeration of bifidobacteria in fecal samples.
Kaneko T; Kurihara H
J Dairy Sci; 1997 Jul; 80(7):1254-9. PubMed ID: 9241587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Quantification of bacteria in human feces using 16S rRNA-hybridization, DNA-staining and flow cytometry.
Vaahtovuo J; Korkeamäki M; Munukka E; Viljanen MK; Toivanen P
J Microbiol Methods; 2005 Dec; 63(3):276-86. PubMed ID: 15935498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Evaluation of two library-independent microbial source tracking methods to identify sources of fecal contamination in French estuaries.
Gourmelon M; Caprais MP; Ségura R; Le Mennec C; Lozach S; Piriou JY; Rincé A
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 73(15):4857-66. PubMed ID: 17557850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Concentrations of host-specific and generic fecal markers measured by quantitative PCR in raw sewage and fresh animal feces.
Silkie SS; Nelson KL
Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4860-71. PubMed ID: 19765792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Polymerase chain reaction and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis monitoring of fecal bifidobacterium populations in a prebiotic and probiotic feeding trial.
Satokari RM; Vaughan EE; Akkermans AD; Saarela M; De Vos WM
Syst Appl Microbiol; 2001 Jul; 24(2):227-31. PubMed ID: 11518325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Chicken- and duck-associated Bacteroides-Prevotella genetic markers for detecting fecal contamination in environmental water.
Kobayashi A; Sano D; Hatori J; Ishii S; Okabe S
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2013 Aug; 97(16):7427-37. PubMed ID: 23053113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparative assessment of human and farm animal faecal microbiota using real-time quantitative PCR.
Furet JP; Firmesse O; Gourmelon M; Bridonneau C; Tap J; Mondot S; Doré J; Corthier G
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2009 Jun; 68(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 19302550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Use of eukaryotic mitochondrial DNA to differentiate human, bovine, porcine and ovine sources in fecally contaminated surface water.
Martellini A; Payment P; Villemur R
Water Res; 2005 Feb; 39(4):541-8. PubMed ID: 15707626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Bifidobacteria in feces and environmental waters.
Lamendella R; Santo Domingo JW; Kelty C; Oerther DB
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 74(3):575-84. PubMed ID: 17993557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Validation of fluorescent in situ hybridization combined with flow cytometry for assessing interindividual variation in the composition of human fecal microflora during long-term storage of samples.
Rochet V; Rigottier-Gois L; Rabot S; Doré J
J Microbiol Methods; 2004 Nov; 59(2):263-70. PubMed ID: 15369862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Quantitative assessment of faecal bifidobacterial populations by real-time PCR using lanthanide probes.
Gueimonde M; Debor L; Tölkkö S; Jokisalo E; Salminen S
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Apr; 102(4):1116-22. PubMed ID: 17381755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Molecular studies of fecal anaerobic commensal bacteria in acute diarrhea in children.
Balamurugan R; Janardhan HP; George S; Raghava MV; Muliyil J; Ramakrishna BS
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2008 May; 46(5):514-9. PubMed ID: 18493205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Development of a qPCR assay for the quantification of porcine adenoviruses as an MST tool for swine fecal contamination in the environment.
Hundesa A; Maluquer de Motes C; Albinana-Gimenez N; Rodriguez-Manzano J; Bofill-Mas S; Suñen E; Rosina Girones R
J Virol Methods; 2009 Jun; 158(1-2):130-5. PubMed ID: 19428581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Application of leftover sample material from waterborne protozoa monitoring for the molecular detection of Bacteroidales and fecal source tracking markers.
Ryu H; Tran H; Ware MW; Iker B; Griffin S; Egorov A; Edge TA; Newmann N; Villegas EN; Domingo JW
J Microbiol Methods; 2011 Sep; 86(3):337-43. PubMed ID: 21693138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Evaluation of real-time PCR targeting the 16S rRNA and recA genes for the enumeration of bifidobacteria in probiotic products.
Masco L; Vanhoutte T; Temmerman R; Swings J; Huys G
Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Feb; 113(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 17088006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Qualitative and quantitative estimation of host-specific fecal pollution using Bacteroides-Prevotella 16S rRNA genetic markers by T-RFLP and real-time PCR analyses.
Savichtcheva O; Okabe S
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(9):1831-40. PubMed ID: 19448320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Enterococci vs coliforms as a possible fecal contamination indicator: baseline data for Karachi.
Hussain M; Rasool SA; Khan MT; Wajid A
Pak J Pharm Sci; 2007 Apr; 20(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17416563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Detection and persistence of fecal Bacteroidales as water quality indicators in unchlorinated drinking water.
Saunders AM; Kristiansen A; Lund MB; Revsbech NP; Schramm A
Syst Appl Microbiol; 2009 Aug; 32(5):362-70. PubMed ID: 19261420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Prevalence, quantification and typing of adenoviruses detected in river and treated drinking water in South Africa.
van Heerden J; Ehlers MM; Heim A; Grabow WO
J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 99(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 16033453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Diversity of Salmonella spp. and fungi in northern Greek rivers and their correlation to fecal pollution indicators.
Arvanitidou M; Kanellou K; Vagiona DG
Environ Res; 2005 Oct; 99(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 16194678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
