These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16877444)

  • 81. [A new syllable text for evaluating near vision].
    Kolling GH; Höltzcke P
    Ophthalmologe; 1995 Feb; 92(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 7719078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Face recognition in age-related maculopathy.
    Bullimore MA; Bailey IL; Wacker RT
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1991 Jun; 32(7):2020-9. PubMed ID: 2055696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. [The Freiburg Vision Test. Automated determination of visual acuity].
    Bach M
    Ophthalmologe; 1995 Apr; 92(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 7780276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. [The Freiburg Vision Test before and after cataract operation].
    Röver J; Bornkessel HC; Nisius A; Bach M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1996 Nov; 209(5):315-6. PubMed ID: 9044981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. A new source of variance in visual acuity.
    Coppens JE; van den Berg TJ
    Vision Res; 2004 Apr; 44(9):951-8. PubMed ID: 14992839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Computerized repeating and averaging improve the test-retest variability of ETDRS visual acuity measurements: implications for sensitivity and specificity.
    Shah N; Laidlaw DA; Shah SP; Sivasubramaniam S; Bunce C; Cousens S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Dec; 52(13):9397-402. PubMed ID: 22003109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. [Repeatability and reliability of the visual acuity examination on logMAR ETDRS and Snellen chart].
    Veselý P; Synek S
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 May; 68(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 22913870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Detection and resolution of vanishing optotype letters in central and peripheral vision.
    Demirel S; Anderson RS; Dakin SC; Thibos LN
    Vision Res; 2012 Apr; 59():9-16. PubMed ID: 22406660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Repeatability of an automated Landolt C test, compared with the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) chart testing.
    Ruamviboonsuk P; Tiensuwan M; Kunawut C; Masayaanon P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Oct; 136(4):662-9. PubMed ID: 14516806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Visual acuity as measured with Landolt C chart and Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.
    Kuo HK; Kuo MT; Tiong IS; Wu PC; Chen YJ; Chen CH
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Apr; 249(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 20658145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Construction and Validation of LEA Hindi Chart: A Multicenter Study.
    Datta S; Varadharajan S; Mazumdar D; Narayanan A; Monira S; Panda S; Hyvärinen L; Satgunam P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 May; 97(5):351-359. PubMed ID: 32413007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. [Comparison of visual acuity measurement with Landolt rings versus numbers].
    Rohrschneider K; Spittler AR; Bach M
    Ophthalmologe; 2019 Nov; 116(11):1058-1063. PubMed ID: 30927070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Small letter contrast sensitivity: an alternative measure of visual resolution for aviation candidates.
    Rabin J
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1995 Jan; 66(1):56-8. PubMed ID: 7695553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Resolution acuity versus recognition acuity with Landolt-style optotypes.
    Heinrich SP; Bach M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Sep; 251(9):2235-41. PubMed ID: 23828648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Idiopathic macular hole: post-operative morpho-functional assessment and prognostic factors for recovery of visual acuity.
    Tirelli F; Sasso P; Scupola A
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2013; 49(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 24071614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Assessing visual acuity across five disease types: ETDRS charts are faster with clinical outcome comparable to Landolt Cs.
    Koenig S; Tonagel F; Schiefer U; Bach M; Heinrich SP
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 252(7):1093-9. PubMed ID: 24867313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Estimating visual acuity by character counting using the Snellen visual acuity chart.
    Levy AH; McCulley TJ; Lam BL; Feuer WJ
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Jun; 19(6):622-4. PubMed ID: 15184944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Dynamic visual acuity using "far" and "near" targets.
    Peters BT; Bloomberg JJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Apr; 125(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 15823804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Comparing distance visual acuity measurement with a novel eye chart and the Landolt C chart in a population of children aged 6-18 years.
    Gorham JP; Bruce BB; Hutchinson AK
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 37(6):1345-1348. PubMed ID: 27826937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. [The closed Landolt ring--a handy test for evaluating suspected simulation].
    Gräf M; Roesen J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Jun; 218(6):435-7. PubMed ID: 11488010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.