These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16877782)

  • 1. Feasibility of a pressure wire and single arterial puncture for assessing aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis.
    Bae JH; Lerman A; Yang E; Rihal C
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2006 Aug; 18(8):359-62. PubMed ID: 16877782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantification of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis using a hybrid approach combining Doppler echocardiography and thermodilution.
    Unger P; Dedobbeleer C; Stoupel E; Preumont N; Argacha JF; Berkenboom G; Van Camp G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 May; 23(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 25296448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Invasive assessment of doubtful aortic stenosis by measuring simultaneous transaortic gradient with a pressure wire.
    Chopard R; Meneveau N; Plastaras P; Janin S; Seronde MF; Ecarnot F; Schiele F
    Am J Cardiol; 2013 Jun; 111(12):1772-7. PubMed ID: 23540549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How important is the impact of pressure recovery on routine evaluation of aortic stenosis? A clinical study in 91 patients.
    Isaaz K; Gaillard O; Cerisier A; Da Costa A; Faure E; Lamaud M; Gerenton C
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):347-56. PubMed ID: 15222280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.
    Burwash IG; Dickinson A; Teskey RJ; Tam JW; Chan KL
    Can J Cardiol; 2000 Aug; 16(8):985-92. PubMed ID: 10978934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discrepancies between direct catheter and echocardiography-based values in aortic stenosis.
    Yang CS; Marshall ES; Fanari Z; Kostal MJ; West JT; Kolm P; Weintraub WS; Doorey AJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 87(3):488-97. PubMed ID: 26033475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Safety and utility of dobutamine and pressure wire use in the hemodynamic assessment of low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.
    Fanari Z; Gunasekaran PC; Shaukat A; Hammami S; Dawn B; Wiley M; Tadros P
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Jun; 19(4):438-443. PubMed ID: 29402710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Double-lumen catheter assessment of aortic stenosis: comparison with separate catheter technique.
    Jayne JE; Catherwood E; Niles NW; Friedman BJ
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Jun; 29(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 8348604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of dual-source computed tomography for the quantification of the aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis versus transthoracic echocardiography and invasive hemodynamic assessment.
    Ropers D; Ropers U; Marwan M; Schepis T; Pflederer T; Wechsel M; Klinghammer L; Flachskampf FA; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1561-7. PubMed ID: 19932793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of invasive and noninvasive assessment of aortic stenosis severity in the elderly.
    Gertz ZM; Raina A; O'Donnell W; McCauley BD; Shellenberger C; Kolansky DM; Wilensky RL; Forfia PR; Herrmann HC
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jun; 5(3):406-14. PubMed ID: 22647520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feasibility assessment of aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis using a pressure wire through a 4 French system and single femoral arterial access.
    Bertog SC; Smith A; Panetta CJ
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2005 Nov; 17(11):E24-6. PubMed ID: 16264211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simultaneous determination of aortic valve area by the Gorlin formula and by transesophageal echocardiography under different transvalvular flow conditions. Evidence that anatomic aortic valve area does not change with variations in flow in aortic stenosis.
    Tardif JC; Rodrigues AG; Hardy JF; Leclerc Y; Petitclerc R; Mongrain R; Mercier LA
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 May; 29(6):1296-302. PubMed ID: 9137227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Catheterization-Doppler discrepancies in nonsimultaneous evaluations of aortic stenosis.
    Aghassi P; Aurigemma GP; Folland ED; Tighe DA
    Echocardiography; 2005 May; 22(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 15901286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nomograms for severity of aortic valve stenosis using peak aortic valve pressure gradient and left ventricular ejection fraction.
    Schoen SP; Zimmermann TF; Rosenberger C; Elmer G; Stolte D; Wunderlich C; Strasser RH
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2009 Jun; 10(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 19155263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standards?
    John AS; Dill T; Brandt RR; Rau M; Ricken W; Bachmann G; Hamm CW
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2003 Aug; 42(3):519-26. PubMed ID: 12906983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of aortic stenosis: the role of pressure recovery evaluated 'in vivo'.
    Razzolini R; Manica A; Tarantini G; Ramondo A; Napodano M; Iliceto S
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 May; 16(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 17578039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aortic stenosis catheterization revisited: a long sheath single-puncture technique.
    Hays J; Lujan M; Chilton R
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2006 Jun; 18(6):262-7. PubMed ID: 16751678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Potential role of Reynolds number in resolving Doppler- and catheter-based transvalvular gradient discrepancies in aortic stenosis.
    Adams JC; Jiamsripong P; Belohlavek M; McMahon EM; Marupakula V; Heys J; Chaliki HP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2011 Mar; 20(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 21560814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of trans-aortic pressure gradient using a coronary pressure wire in patients with mechanical aortic and mitral valve prostheses.
    Kherada N; Brenes JC; Kini AS; Dangas GD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 92(1):193-199. PubMed ID: 28296135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamic progression of valvular aortic stenosis over time: comparison between aortic valve resistance and valve area.
    Faggiano P; Gualeni A; Antonini-Canterin F; Rusconi C; Nicolosi G
    G Ital Cardiol; 1999 Oct; 29(10):1131-6. PubMed ID: 10546122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.