These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16877867)
1. An alternative foundation for the planning and evaluation of linkage analysis. II. Implications for multiple test adjustments. Strug LJ; Hodge SE Hum Hered; 2006; 61(4):200-9. PubMed ID: 16877867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An alternative foundation for the planning and evaluation of linkage analysis. I. Decoupling "error probabilities" from "measures of evidence". Strug LJ; Hodge SE Hum Hered; 2006; 61(3):166-88. PubMed ID: 16865000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using parametric multipoint lods and mods for linkage analysis requires a shift in statistical thinking. Hodge SE; Baskurt Z; Strug LJ Hum Hered; 2011; 72(4):264-75. PubMed ID: 22189469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On computation of p-values in parametric linkage analysis. Kurbasic A; Hössjer O Hum Hered; 2004; 57(4):207-19. PubMed ID: 15583427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Futility interim monitoring with control of type I and II error probabilities using the interim Z-value or confidence limit. Lachin JM Clin Trials; 2009 Dec; 6(6):565-73. PubMed ID: 19933716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hail the impossible: p-values, evidence, and likelihood. Johansson T Scand J Psychol; 2011 Apr; 52(2):113-25. PubMed ID: 21077903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A method to increase the power of multiple testing procedures through sample splitting. Rubin D; Dudoit S; van der Laan M Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article19. PubMed ID: 17049030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How useful is the fine-scale mapping of complex trait linkage peaks? Evaluating the impact of additional microsatellite genotyping on the posterior probability of linkage. Wiltshire S; Morris AP; McCarthy MI; Cardon LR Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Jan; 28(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 15493062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Issues of research in medicine]. Topić E Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():5-16. PubMed ID: 16526304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data]. Ivanković D; Tiljak MK Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The fallback procedure for evaluating a single family of hypotheses. Wiens BL; Dmitrienko A J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):929-42. PubMed ID: 16279352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A pure likelihood approach to the analysis of genetic association data: an alternative to Bayesian and frequentist analysis. Strug LJ; Hodge SE; Chiang T; Pal DK; Corey PN; Rohde C Eur J Hum Genet; 2010 Aug; 18(8):933-41. PubMed ID: 20424645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Applying the law of iterated logarithm to control type I error in cumulative meta-analysis of binary outcomes. Hu M; Cappelleri JC; Lan KK Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 17848494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate. Piver MS Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regional inference with averaged P values increases the power to detect linkage. Goldin LR; Chase GA; Wilson AF Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 10446463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]