190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16879753)
1. Country development and manuscript selection bias: a review of published studies.
Yousefi-Nooraie R; Shakiba B; Mortaz-Hejri S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Aug; 6():37. PubMed ID: 16879753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.
De Oliveira GS; Chang R; Kendall MC; Fitzgerald PC; McCarthy RJ
Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22344237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improvement in the quality of randomized controlled trials among general anesthesiology journals 2000 to 2006: a 6-year follow-up.
Greenfield ML; Mhyre JM; Mashour GA; Blum JM; Yen EC; Rosenberg AL
Anesth Analg; 2009 Jun; 108(6):1916-21. PubMed ID: 19448222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Methodological reporting of randomized clinical trials in respiratory research in 2010.
Lu Y; Yao Q; Gu J; Shen C
Respir Care; 2013 Sep; 58(9):1546-51. PubMed ID: 23307824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Control of bias in randomized controlled trials published in prosthodontic journals.
Dumbrigue HB; Jones JS; Esquivel JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):592-6. PubMed ID: 11753309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of rejected Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology manuscripts.
Silberzweig JE; Khorsandi AS
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1620-3. PubMed ID: 18693043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The journal impact factor as a predictor of trial quality and outcomes: cohort study of hepatobiliary randomized clinical trials.
Gluud LL; Sørensen TI; Gøtzsche PC; Gluud C
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Nov; 100(11):2431-5. PubMed ID: 16279896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. National representation in the anaesthesia literature: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited anaesthesia journals.
Bould MD; Boet S; Riem N; Kasanda C; Sossou A; Bruppacher HR
Anaesthesia; 2010 Aug; 65(8):799-804. PubMed ID: 20586744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?
Poolman RW; Struijs PA; Krips R; Sierevelt IN; Lutz KH; Bhandari M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Sep; 6():44. PubMed ID: 16965628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing quality of reports on randomized clinical trials in nursing journals.
Parent N; Hanley JA
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 19(2):25-39. PubMed ID: 19517902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Language of publication has a small influence on the quality of reports of controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions.
Shiwa SR; Moseley AM; Maher CG; Pena Costa LO
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 23177897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.
Jones AW
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jan; 165(2-3):115-28. PubMed ID: 16784827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Alphabetic bias in the selection of reviewers for the American Journal of Roentgenology.
Richardson ML
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Dec; 191(6):W213-6. PubMed ID: 19020207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
Enquselassie F
Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Publication bias in papers presented to the Australian Orthopaedic Association Annual Scientific Meeting.
Harris IA; Mourad MS; Kadir A; Solomon MJ; Young JM
ANZ J Surg; 2006 Jun; 76(6):427-31. PubMed ID: 16768761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors influencing editors' decision on acceptance or rejection of manuscripts: the authors' perspective.
Shakiba B; Salmasian H; Yousefi-Nooraie R; Rohanizadegan M
Arch Iran Med; 2008 May; 11(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 18426315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Getting published in peer-reviewed journals.
Dimitroulis G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 40(12):1342-5. PubMed ID: 22142552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A survey identified publication bias in the secondary literature.
Carter AO; Griffin GH; Carter TP
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 16488354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Composition of the editorial boards of leading medical education journals.
Tutarel O
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Jan; 4():3. PubMed ID: 14733618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of characteristics of randomized clinical trials in leukemia that are associated with how results are reported.
Burrett JA; Lunn D
J Evid Based Med; 2011 Nov; 4(4):217-24. PubMed ID: 23672752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
