400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16880155)
21. The effect of muscle loading on the simulation of bone remodelling in the proximal femur.
Bitsakos C; Kerner J; Fisher I; Amis AA
J Biomech; 2005 Jan; 38(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 15519348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of bone stress distribution around the hip joint prosthesis with stepped stem].
Tan R; Fan H; Wu F; Chen J; Luo J; Zhang X
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 28(4):732-6. PubMed ID: 21936371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Contribution of muscular weakness to osteoporosis: computational and animal models.
Be'ery-Lipperman M; Gefen A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Nov; 20(9):984-97. PubMed ID: 16039022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique.
Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of under-reaming on the cup/bone interface of a press fit hip replacement.
Zivkovic I; Gonzalez M; Amirouche F
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Apr; 132(4):041008. PubMed ID: 20387971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement.
Kluess D; Martin H; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
Med Eng Phys; 2007 May; 29(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 16901743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of interface condition and implant design on bone remodelling and failure risk for the resurfaced femoral head.
Rothstock S; Uhlenbrock A; Bishop N; Laird L; Nassutt R; Morlock M
J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1646-53. PubMed ID: 21511258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant.
Speirs AD; Heller MO; Taylor WR; Duda GN; Perka C
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 17275151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of FE idealisation, load conditions and interface assumptions on the stress distribution and fatigue notch factor in the human femur with an endoprosthesis.
Hedia HS; Barton DC; Fisher J; Elmidany TT
Biomed Mater Eng; 1996; 6(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 8922259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of a thin HA coating on the stress/strain distribution in bone around dental implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Aoki H; Ozeki K; Ohtani Y; Fukui Y; Asaoka T
Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(3):157-69. PubMed ID: 16518015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Numerical evaluation of bone remodelling and adaptation considering different hip prosthesis designs.
Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Gubaua JE; Pereira JT
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Dec; 50():122-129. PubMed ID: 29100185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of total hip design on dislocation: a computer model and clinical analysis.
Padgett DE; Lipman J; Robie B; Nestor BJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Jun; 447():48-52. PubMed ID: 16741474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Subject specific finite element analysis of implant stability for a cementless femoral stem.
Pettersen SH; Wik TS; Skallerud B
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jul; 24(6):480-7. PubMed ID: 19368993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Acetabular cup geometry and bone-implant interference have more influence on initial periprosthetic joint space than joint loading and surgical cup insertion.
Ong KL; Lehman J; Notz WI; Santner TJ; Bartel DL
J Biomech Eng; 2006 Apr; 128(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 16524327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Primary stability of uncemented femoral resurfacing implants for varying interface parameters and material formulations during walking and stair climbing.
Rothstock S; Uhlenbrock A; Bishop N; Morlock M
J Biomech; 2010 Feb; 43(3):521-6. PubMed ID: 19913227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Finite element analysis of shear stresses at the implant-bone interface of an acetabular press-fit cup during impingement.
Voigt C; Klöhn C; Bader R; von Salis-Soglio G; Scholz R
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Apr; 52(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 17408381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cement mantle fatigue failure in total hip replacement: experimental and computational testing.
Jeffers JR; Browne M; Lennon AB; Prendergast PJ; Taylor M
J Biomech; 2007; 40(7):1525-33. PubMed ID: 17070816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Prediction of femoral remodeling after implantation of artifical femoral head].
Gao Z; Zhao C; Yu Q; Wu D; Yu J
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Jun; 20(2):295-8. PubMed ID: 12856602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mechanical aspects of degree of cement bonding and implant wedge effect.
Yoon YS; Oxland TR; Hodgson AJ; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Choi D
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18584929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
