262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16880294)
1. Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy.
Gage JC; Hanson VW; Abbey K; Dippery S; Gardner S; Kubota J; Schiffman M; Solomon D; Jeronimo J;
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 108(2):264-72. PubMed ID: 16880294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
ASCUS-LSIL Traige Study (ALTS) Group
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1383-92. PubMed ID: 12824967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy.
Cox JT; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1406-12. PubMed ID: 12824970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of cervical histologic results using an abbreviated Reid Colposcopic Index during ALTS.
Ferris DG; Litaker MS;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 194(3):704-10. PubMed ID: 16522401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regardless of skill, performing more biopsies increases the sensitivity of colposcopy.
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Burchette RJ; Hu S; Zhang X; Qiao YL
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2011 Jul; 15(3):180-8. PubMed ID: 21436729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of atypical and low-grade cervical cytology in private practice.
Nyirjesy I; Billingsley FS; Forman MR
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):601-7. PubMed ID: 9764636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening properties of human papillomavirus testing for predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion smears: a prospective study.
Dane C; Batmaz G; Dane B; Cetin A
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Apr; 13(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 19302953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology.
Liu AH; Walker J; Gage JC; Gold MA; Zuna R; Dunn ST; Schiffman M; Wentzensen N
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 130(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 29112672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ASCCP Risk-Based Colposcopy Recommendations Applied in Thai Women With Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance or Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Cytology.
Phianpiset R; Ruengkhachorn I; Jareemit N; Ittiamornlert P; Chaopotong P; Hanamornroongruang S; Horthongkham N
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Sep; 136(3):510-517. PubMed ID: 32769651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colposcopic evaluation of pre-invasive and early cervical carcinoma with histologic correlation.
Shahida SM; Mirza TT; Saleh AF; Islam MA
Mymensingh Med J; 2012 Apr; 21(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 22561759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postcolposcopy management strategies for women referred with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or human papillomavirus DNA-positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a two-year prospective study.
Guido R; Schiffman M; Solomon D; Burke L;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1401-5. PubMed ID: 12824969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of colposcopically directed, four-quadrant cervical biopsy by the colposcopy trainee.
Homesley HD; Jobson VW; Reish RL
J Reprod Med; 1984 May; 29(5):311-6. PubMed ID: 6726700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized trial on the management of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology interpretations.
ASCUS-LSIL Traige Study (ALTS) Group
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1393-400. PubMed ID: 12824968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The accuracy of colposcopic grading for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Massad LS; Jeronimo J; Katki HA; Schiffman M;
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jul; 13(3):137-44. PubMed ID: 19550210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Clinical significance of atypical squamous cells and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in cervical smear].
Liu J; Song XH; Wang QX
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jul; 87(25):1764-6. PubMed ID: 17919385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I and the clinical significance of p16(INK4a) protein as a marker of progression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I].
Wang R; Li X; Qian M; Niu J; You Z
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 50(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 26268412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of guidelines for observational management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in young women.
Dempster-Rivett K; Innes CR; Simcock BJ; Harker D; Williman JA; Van Der Griend RA; Whitehead M; Hibma M; Lawton BA; Fitzgerald P; Dudley NM; Petrich S; Faherty J; Bergzoll C; Eva L; Sadler L; Pather S; Wrede CD; Sykes PH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Sep; 223(3):408.e1-408.e11. PubMed ID: 32109465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing biopsy procedures during colposcopy for women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results: a multicenter prospective study.
Nakamura Y; Matsumoto K; Satoh T; Nishide K; Nozue A; Shimabukuro K; Endo S; Nagai K; Oki A; Minaguchi T; Morishita Y; Noguchi M; Yoshikawa H
Int J Clin Oncol; 2015 Jun; 20(3):579-85. PubMed ID: 25145298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL on Pap smear reports: management by repeat Pap smear, HPV DNA testing, or colposcopy?
Ferris DG; Wright TC; Litaker MS; Richart RM; Lorincz AT; Sun XW; Borgatta L; Buck H; Kramer L; Rubin R
J Fam Pract; 1998 Feb; 46(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 9487318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The quality of community colposcopic practice.
Benedet JL; Matisic JP; Bertrand MA
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 103(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 14704251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
