217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16880306)
1. Morning compared with evening induction of labor: a nested randomized controlled trial. A nested randomized controlled trial.
Dodd JM; Crowther CA; Robinson JS
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 108(2):350-60. PubMed ID: 16880306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Cheng SY; Ming H; Lee JC
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Start of induction of labour with oxytocin in the morning or in the evening. A randomised controlled trial.
Bakker JJ; De Vos R; Pel M; Wisman C; Van Lith JM; Mol BW; Van Der Post JA
BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):562-8. PubMed ID: 19250367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Controlled-release misoprostol vaginal insert in parous women for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Ewert K; Powers B; Robertson S; Alfirevic Z
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17077234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Lin MG; Reid KJ; Treaster MR; Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Lu GC
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 17766600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term.
Zeteroğlu S; Engin-Ustün Y; Ustün Y; Güvercinçi M; Sahin G; Kamaci M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 May; 19(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 16753768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with favorable cervical examinations.
Wing DA; Fassett MJ; Guberman C; Tran S; Parrish A; Guinn D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-6. PubMed ID: 15284771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin.
Fonseca L; Wood HC; Lucas MJ; Ramin SM; Phatak D; Gilstrap LC; Yeomans ER
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):305.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18771993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized trial of administration of prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labor in the morning or the evening.
Oei SG; Jongmans L; Mol BW
J Perinat Med; 2000; 28(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 10765510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women.
Culver J; Strauss RA; Brody S; Dorman K; Timlin S; McMahon MJ
Am J Perinatol; 2004 Apr; 21(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 15085496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acupuncture to induce labor: a randomized controlled trial.
Smith CA; Crowther CA; Collins CT; Coyle ME
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Nov; 112(5):1067-74. PubMed ID: 18978107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison between single dose of 50 microg oral misoprostol and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol for labor induction.
Paisarntantiwong R; Getgan M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88 Suppl 2():S56-62. PubMed ID: 17722318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison between 50 mcg oral misoprostol every 4 hours and 6 hours for labor induction: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Pongsatha S; Tongsong T; Somsak T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jul; 84(7):989-94. PubMed ID: 11759980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized trial of two preparations of vaginal prostaglandin for pre-induction cervical ripening.
Murray HG; Buonocore A; Hawley J
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Dec; 86(6):880-5. PubMed ID: 7501332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Induction of labor or serial antenatal fetal monitoring in postterm pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.
Heimstad R; Skogvoll E; Mattsson LA; Johansen OJ; Eik-Nes SH; Salvesen KA
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 109(3):609-17. PubMed ID: 17329511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
