These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16880306)

  • 41. Morning versus evening induction of labour for improving outcomes.
    Bakker JJ; van der Goes BY; Pel M; Mol BW; van der Post JA
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Feb; (2):CD007707. PubMed ID: 23450578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Misoprostol outpatient cervical ripening without subsequent induction of labor: a randomized trial.
    McKenna DS; Ester JB; Proffitt M; Waddell KR
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 104(3):579-84. PubMed ID: 15339772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A randomized trial of vaginal prostaglandin E2 for induction of labor. Insert vs. tablet.
    Rabl M; Joura EA; Yücel Y; Egarter C
    J Reprod Med; 2002 Feb; 47(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 11883349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
    Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Comparison of the effectiveness of prostaglandin E2 gel in evening and morning induction of labor].
    Kupietz R; Faber J; Heidegger H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1994; 116(8):468-73. PubMed ID: 7941816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening at term: comparison of outpatient vs. inpatient administration.
    Chang DW; Velazquez MD; Colyer M; Klaus P; Mallipeddi SK; Rayburn WF
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Oct; 50(10):735-9. PubMed ID: 16320553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Success rates with low dose misoprostol before induction of labor for nulliparas with severe preeclampsia at various gestational ages.
    Berkley E; Meng C; Rayburn WF
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Nov; 20(11):825-31. PubMed ID: 17943644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction.
    Sifakis S; Angelakis E; Avgoustinakis E; Fragouli Y; Mantas N; Koukoura O; Vardaki E; Koumantakis E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Apr; 275(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 17028904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction.
    Prager M; Eneroth-Grimfors E; Edlund M; Marions L
    BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 18715244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Mode of delivery in pregnant women with hypertensive disorders and unfavorable cervix following induction of labor with vaginal application of prostaglandin E.
    Ben-Haroush A; Yogev Y; Glickman H; Kaplan B; Hod M; Bar J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Jul; 84(7):665-71. PubMed ID: 15954877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Early versus delayed oxytocin augmentation in nulliparous women with prolonged labour--a randomised controlled trial.
    Dencker A; Berg M; Bergqvist L; Ladfors L; Thorsén LS; Lilja H
    BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):530-6. PubMed ID: 19250364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean.
    Grobman WA; Gilbert S; Landon MB; Spong CY; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 109(2 Pt 1):262-9. PubMed ID: 17267822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Membrane sweeping at initiation of formal labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Tan PC; Jacob R; Omar SZ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 107(3):569-77. PubMed ID: 16507926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor at term.
    Allen VM; O'Connell CM; Baskett TF
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 108(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 16880297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of different partogram action lines on birth outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lavender T; Alfirevic Z; Walkinshaw S
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 108(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 16880298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Trial of extra amniotic saline infusion with oxytocin versus prostaglandin E2 pessary for induction of labor.
    Mazhar SB; Imran R; Alam K
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Jun; 13(6):317-20. PubMed ID: 12814527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Oral misoprostol for induction of labor in prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term: a randomized control trial.
    Cheung PC; Yeo EL; Wong KS; Tang LC
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(9):1128-33. PubMed ID: 16929421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Safety and efficacy of oral versus vaginal misoprostol use for induction of labour at term.
    Abbassi RM; Sirichand P; Rizvi S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Oct; 18(10):625-9. PubMed ID: 18940120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Complications of labor induction among multiparous women in a community-based hospital system.
    Battista L; Chung JH; Lagrew DC; Wing DA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 197(3):241.e1-7; discussion 322-3, e1-4. PubMed ID: 17826404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Pettker CM; Pocock SB; Smok DP; Lee SM; Devine PC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1320-6. PubMed ID: 18515515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.