These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

529 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16881165)

  • 1. Hospital peer review standards and due process: moving from tort doctrine toward contract principles based on clinical practice guidelines.
    Van Tassel K
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2006; 36(4):1179-256. PubMed ID: 16881165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sounding board. Even more legal controls on the physician's hospital practice.
    Rubsamen DS
    N Engl J Med; 1975 Apr; 292(17):917-9. PubMed ID: 1117916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hospital liability for defamation of character during the peer review process: sticks and stones may break my bones, but words may cost me my job.
    Oliverio J
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1991 Sep; (151):7-28. PubMed ID: 10114742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. They just don't get it.
    Hackney VH; Le Grand AC
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1992 Dec; 10(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 10122732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality control in health care: developments in the law of medical malpractice.
    Furrow BR
    Leg Med; 1994; ():83-131. PubMed ID: 7830487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Practice guidelines as legal standards governing physician liability.
    Havighurst CC
    Law Contemp Probl; 1991; 54(1-2):Spring 87-117. PubMed ID: 10114977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A framework for quality improvement: an analysis of factors responsible for improvement at hospitals participating in the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) quality improvement initiative.
    Glickman SW; Boulding W; Staelin R; Mulgund J; Roe MT; Lytle BL; Rumsfeld JS; Gibler WB; Ohman EM; Schulman KA; Peterson ED
    Am Heart J; 2007 Dec; 154(6):1206-20. PubMed ID: 18035096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protection of quality assurance and peer review data.
    Stevens M
    Health Law Can; 1992; 13(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 10126149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The implications of practice guidelines for physician medical malpractice liability.
    Harlan D
    Physician Exec; 1994 May; 20(5):20-1. PubMed ID: 10134059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 'Guidance' poses challenges. Hospitals now held more accountable than ever.
    Martin RH
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1998 Jun; 23(6):110-1. PubMed ID: 10180167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of clinical practice guidelines in health care reform.
    Rosoff AJ
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1995; 5(2):369-96. PubMed ID: 10152584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of qui tam to the quality of health care.
    Hsia DC
    J Leg Med; 1993 Jun; 14(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 8340713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical guidelines: a defense in medical malpractice suits.
    Costello MM; Murphy KM
    Physician Exec; 1995 Aug; 21(8):10-2. PubMed ID: 10144546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Federal peer review protection.
    McCann RW
    Trustee; 1987 Nov; 40(11):24. PubMed ID: 10285135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. State medical peer review: high cost but no benefit--is it time for a change?
    Scheutzow SO
    Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(1):7-60. PubMed ID: 10207570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physician defamation. Candor rarely results in liability.
    Lingle EA; Frazier DS
    J Leg Med; 1997 Dec; 18(4):521-38. PubMed ID: 9433039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Establishing standards of institutional performance.
    Hofmann PB
    Hosp Prog; 1976 Feb; 57(2):50-3. PubMed ID: 1245346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Universal health care and the continued reliance on custom in determining medical malpractice.
    Henderson JA; Siliciano JA
    Cornell Law Rev; 1994 Sep; 79(6):1382-404. PubMed ID: 10141438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The National Practitioner Data Bank: the first 18 months.
    Puryear MA; Politzer RM; Anderson J; Mullan F
    Physician Exec; 1993; 19(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 10125933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meeting the peer review challenge.
    Waxman JM
    Health Syst Rev; 1991; 24(5):38-40. PubMed ID: 10113815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.