These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16881788)

  • 1. Vision and touch are automatically integrated for the perception of sequences of events.
    Bresciani JP; Dammeier F; Ernst MO
    J Vis; 2006 Apr; 6(5):554-64. PubMed ID: 16881788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tri-modal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events.
    Bresciani JP; Dammeier F; Ernst MO
    Brain Res Bull; 2008 Apr; 75(6):753-60. PubMed ID: 18394521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Signal reliability modulates auditory-tactile integration for event counting.
    Bresciani JP; Ernst MO
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(11):1157-61. PubMed ID: 17589318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Counting visual and tactile events: the effect of attention on multisensory integration.
    Werkhoven PJ; van Erp JB; Philippi TG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1854-61. PubMed ID: 19933568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human trimodal perception follows optimal statistical inference.
    Wozny DR; Beierholm UR; Shams L
    J Vis; 2008 Mar; 8(3):24.1-11. PubMed ID: 18484830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention.
    Helbig HB; Ernst MO
    J Vis; 2008 Jan; 8(1):21.1-16. PubMed ID: 18318624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning to integrate arbitrary signals from vision and touch.
    Ernst MO
    J Vis; 2007 Jun; 7(5):7.1-14. PubMed ID: 18217847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vision and touch: independent or integrated systems for the perception of texture?
    Whitaker TA; Simões-Franklin C; Newell FN
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():59-72. PubMed ID: 18585689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What aspects of vision facilitate haptic processing?
    Millar S; Al-Attar Z
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Dec; 59(3):258-68. PubMed ID: 16154677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lost in the move? Secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body.
    Gallace A; Zeeden S; Röder B; Spence C
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):215-29. PubMed ID: 19647451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-modal interactions between audition, touch, and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):254-71. PubMed ID: 11970790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An event-related brain potential study of cross-modal links in spatial attention between vision and touch.
    Eimer M; Driver J
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Sep; 37(5):697-705. PubMed ID: 11037046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vision merges with touch in a purely tactile discrimination.
    Arabzadeh E; Clifford CW; Harris JA
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jul; 19(7):635-41. PubMed ID: 18727775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feeling what you hear: auditory signals can modulate tactile tap perception.
    Bresciani JP; Ernst MO; Drewing K; Bouyer G; Maury V; Kheddar A
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 162(2):172-80. PubMed ID: 15791465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modality-specific attention attenuates visual-tactile integration and recalibration effects by reducing prior expectations of a common source for vision and touch.
    Badde S; Navarro KT; Landy MS
    Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104170. PubMed ID: 32036027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of cross-sensory attentional demand on subitizing and on mapping number onto space.
    Anobile G; Turi M; Cicchini GM; Burr DC
    Vision Res; 2012 Dec; 74():102-9. PubMed ID: 22727938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian calibration of simultaneity in tactile temporal order judgment.
    Miyazaki M; Yamamoto S; Uchida S; Kitazawa S
    Nat Neurosci; 2006 Jul; 9(7):875-7. PubMed ID: 16732276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repetition priming for multisensory stimuli: task-irrelevant and task-relevant stimuli are associated if semantically related but with no advantage over uni-sensory stimuli.
    Hecht D; Reiner M; Karni A
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1251():236-44. PubMed ID: 19022232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modulation of somatosensory event-related potential components in a tactile-visual cross-modal task.
    Ohara S; Lenz FA; Zhou YD
    Neuroscience; 2006; 138(4):1387-95. PubMed ID: 16442738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tactile remapping beyond space.
    Azañón E; Camacho K; Soto-Faraco S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1858-67. PubMed ID: 20584190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.