617 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16882265)
1. Prospective study of non-closure or closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery in 124 women: Impact of prior peritoneal closure at primary cesarean on the interval time between first cesarean section and the next pregnancy and significant adhesion at second cesarean.
Komoto Y; Shimoya K; Shimizu T; Kimura T; Hayashi S; Temma-Asano K; Kanagawa T; Fukuda H; Murata Y
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2006 Aug; 32(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 16882265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Closure vs non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean delivery: 16 year study.
Weerawetwat W; Buranawanich S; Kanawong M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Sep; 87(9):1007-11. PubMed ID: 15515998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized study of closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery.
Hull DB; Varner MW
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jun; 77(6):818-21. PubMed ID: 2030849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-closure versus closure of peritoneum during cesarean section: a randomized study.
Zareian Z; Zareian P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006; 128(1-2):267-9. PubMed ID: 16716491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peritoneal closure at primary cesarean delivery and adhesions.
Lyell DJ; Caughey AB; Hu E; Daniels K
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 106(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 16055575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Closure versus non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section--evaluation of pain. A randomized study.
Højberg KE; Aagaard J; Laursen H; Diab L; Secher NJ
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Aug; 77(7):741-5. PubMed ID: 9740522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short-term effects of closure versus non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean section: a prospective randomized study.
Anteby EY; Kruchkovich J; Kapustian V; Gdalevich M; Shenhav S; Gemer O
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1026-30. PubMed ID: 20144167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section. Results from repeat cesarean sections].
Nather A; Zeisler H; Sam CE; Husslein P; Joura EA
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2001 Jun; 113(11-12):451-3. PubMed ID: 11467092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incidence of significant adhesions at repeat cesarean section and the relationship to method of prior peritoneal closure.
Myers SA; Bennett TL
J Reprod Med; 2005 Sep; 50(9):659-62. PubMed ID: 16363753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomised controlled study of non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section in a Nigerian population.
Malomo OO; Kuti O; Orji EO; Ogunniyi SO; Sule SS
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Jul; 26(5):429-32. PubMed ID: 16846869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Caesarean section: closure or non-closure of peritoneum? A randomized trial of postoperative morbidity].
Huchon C; Raiffort C; Chis C; Messaoudi F; Jacquemot MC; Panel P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Oct; 33(10):745-9. PubMed ID: 16154376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Double-layer closure of uterine incision with visceral and parietal peritoneal closure: are they obligatory steps of routine cesarean sections?
Ohel G; Younis JS; Lang N; Levit A
J Matern Fetal Med; 1996; 5(6):366-9. PubMed ID: 8972417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical observation of Stark cesarean section as secondary abdominal surgery].
Ma YY; Zhu XL; Dong Y; Wang YQ; Zheng ZM; Zhang RJ; Xu Y; Zhao JJ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Nov; 40(11):729-31. PubMed ID: 16324243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized controlled study of peritoneal closure at cesarean section.
Galaal KA; Krolikowski A
Saudi Med J; 2000 Aug; 21(8):759-61. PubMed ID: 11423890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of closure versus nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section on adhesions: a prospective randomized study.
Kapustian V; Anteby EY; Gdalevich M; Shenhav S; Lavie O; Gemer O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jan; 206(1):56.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21924397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Closure or non closure of the peritoneum at cesarean section in 2008?].
Doret M; Gaucherand P
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Sep; 37(5):463-8. PubMed ID: 18495379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Peritoneal closure or non-closure at caesarean section.
van Bogaert LJ; Misra A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Apr; 29(3):217-9. PubMed ID: 19358028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incidence of adhesions at repeat cesarean delivery.
Hamel KJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):e31-2. PubMed ID: 17466672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transverse uterine incision non-closure versus closure: an experimental study in sheep.
Gül A; Simşek Y; Uğraş S; Gül T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Oct; 79(10):813-7. PubMed ID: 11304961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rectus muscle and visceral peritoneum closure at cesarean delivery and intraabdominal adhesions.
Lyell DJ; Caughey AB; Hu E; Blumenfeld Y; El-Sayed YY; Daniels K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):515.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22463952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
