These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

481 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16882647)

  • 1. Reliable gene signatures for microarray classification: assessment of stability and performance.
    Davis CA; Gerick F; Hintermair V; Friedel CC; Fundel K; Küffner R; Zimmer R
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(19):2356-63. PubMed ID: 16882647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mixture classification model based on clinical markers for breast cancer prognosis.
    Zeng T; Liu J
    Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):129-37. PubMed ID: 20005686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gene selection in cancer classification using sparse logistic regression with Bayesian regularization.
    Cawley GC; Talbot NL
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(19):2348-55. PubMed ID: 16844704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gene selection via the BAHSIC family of algorithms.
    Song L; Bedo J; Borgwardt KM; Gretton A; Smola A
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i490-8. PubMed ID: 17646335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cancer classification and prediction using logistic regression with Bayesian gene selection.
    Zhou X; Liu KY; Wong ST
    J Biomed Inform; 2004 Aug; 37(4):249-59. PubMed ID: 15465478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ensemble gene selection by grouping for microarray data classification.
    Liu H; Liu L; Zhang H
    J Biomed Inform; 2010 Feb; 43(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 19699316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Independent component analysis-based penalized discriminant method for tumor classification using gene expression data.
    Huang DS; Zheng CH
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(15):1855-62. PubMed ID: 16709589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ties problem resulting from counting-based error estimators and its impact on gene selection algorithms.
    Zhou X; Mao KZ
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(20):2507-15. PubMed ID: 16908500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Penalized Cox regression analysis in the high-dimensional and low-sample size settings, with applications to microarray gene expression data.
    Gui J; Li H
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3001-8. PubMed ID: 15814556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Classification of microarray data with factor mixture models.
    Martella F
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jan; 22(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 16287938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A GMM-IG framework for selecting genes as expression panel biomarkers.
    Wang M; Chen JY
    Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):75-82. PubMed ID: 20004087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal number of features as a function of sample size for various classification rules.
    Hua J; Xiong Z; Lowey J; Suh E; Dougherty ER
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(8):1509-15. PubMed ID: 15572470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What should be expected from feature selection in small-sample settings.
    Sima C; Dougherty ER
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(19):2430-6. PubMed ID: 16870934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robust classification modeling on microarray data using misclassification penalized posterior.
    Soukup M; Cho H; Lee JK
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21 Suppl 1():i423-30. PubMed ID: 15961487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A hierarchical Naïve Bayes Model for handling sample heterogeneity in classification problems: an application to tissue microarrays.
    Demichelis F; Magni P; Piergiorgi P; Rubin MA; Bellazzi R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Nov; 7():514. PubMed ID: 17125514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Classification based upon gene expression data: bias and precision of error rates.
    Wood IA; Visscher PM; Mengersen KL
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jun; 23(11):1363-70. PubMed ID: 17392326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Derivation of stable microarray cancer-differentiating signatures using consensus scoring of multiple random sampling and gene-ranking consistency evaluation.
    Tang ZQ; Han LY; Lin HH; Cui J; Jia J; Low BC; Li BW; Chen YZ
    Cancer Res; 2007 Oct; 67(20):9996-10003. PubMed ID: 17942933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multi-class cancer subtype classification based on gene expression signatures with reliability analysis.
    Fu LM; Fu-Liu CS
    FEBS Lett; 2004 Mar; 561(1-3):186-90. PubMed ID: 15013775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Algebraic stability indicators for ranked lists in molecular profiling.
    Jurman G; Merler S; Barla A; Paoli S; Galea A; Furlanello C
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 24(2):258-64. PubMed ID: 18024475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of differential gene expression for microarray data using recursive random forest.
    Wu XY; Wu ZY; Li K
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(24):2492-6. PubMed ID: 19187584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.