These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16883613)

  • 1. Competency in the criminal context: an analysis of Robert Schopp's views.
    Slobogin C
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 16883613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forcible medication of mentally ill criminal defendants: the case of Russell Eugene Weston, Jr.
    Feinberg A
    Stanford Law Rev; 2002 Apr; 54(4):769-91. PubMed ID: 11944661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retributive constraints on the concept of competency: the required role of 'patently false beliefs' in understanding competency to be executed.
    Saks E; Litt M
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 19156671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Constitutional law--substantive due process--Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that criminal defendant's best interests justify forcible medication.--Commonwealth v. Sam, 952 A.2d 565 (Pa. 2008).
    Harv Law Rev; 2009 May; 122(7):1961-8. PubMed ID: 19492499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sell v. U.S.: involuntary treatment case or catalyst for change?
    Leong GB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):292-4. PubMed ID: 16186189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What medical school did you graduate from? Judicial prescribing of medical treatments.
    Miller RD
    J Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(2):215-33. PubMed ID: 12546011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Involuntary treatment and competence to proceed in the criminal process: capital and noncapital cases.
    Schopp RF
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(4):495-528. PubMed ID: 16883622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Criminal madness: cultural iconography and insanity.
    Covey RD
    Stanford Law Rev; 2009 Apr; 61(6):1375-428. PubMed ID: 19489183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Canadian law and the legal process.
    Walter B
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(1):135-6; author reply 136. PubMed ID: 15809259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Competency to refuse psychotropic medication: three alternatives to the law's cognitive standard.
    Saks ER
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1993 Jan; 47(3):689-761. PubMed ID: 16617526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Investigation of verdicts in lawsuits involving competency to stand trial].
    Nakajima N
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2006; 108(11):1128-41. PubMed ID: 17313060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The normative concept of guilt in criminal law between freedom of will and neurobiological determinism].
    Czerner F
    Arch Kriminol; 2006; 218(5-6):129-57. PubMed ID: 17217181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Competently assessing competence to stand trial can be trying.
    Akinkunmi AA
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(2):189-90. PubMed ID: 16844798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Criminal law and psychiatry].
    Nakatani Y
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2007; 109(9):882-5. PubMed ID: 18213931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Criminal procedure--substantive due process--D.C. Circuit holds that the government may forcibly treat incompetent criminal defendants with antipsychotic medication to render them competent to stand trial. --United States v. Weston, 255 F.3d 873 (D.C. Cir. 2001), petition for cert. filed (U.S. Sept. 5, 2001) (No. 01-6161).
    Harv Law Rev; 2001 Dec; 115(2):737-43. PubMed ID: 11958231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Slater Method.
    Wall BW; Krupp BH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):525-6. PubMed ID: 14974810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Without thinking: impulsive aggression and criminal responsibility.
    Shuman DW; Gold LH
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(6):723-34. PubMed ID: 19039791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Steel traps and unattainable aspirations: a comment on Kress.
    Morse SJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(4):599-606. PubMed ID: 16883614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.
    Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA
    Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medication of criminal defendants.
    Westreich LM
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(4):504. PubMed ID: 11785623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.