173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16883622)
1. Involuntary treatment and competence to proceed in the criminal process: capital and noncapital cases.
Schopp RF
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(4):495-528. PubMed ID: 16883622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treating criminal offenders in correctional contexts: identifying interests and distributing responsibilities.
Schopp RF
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(5):833-55. PubMed ID: 19784945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of competency for execution: professional guidelines and an evaluation checklist.
Zapf PA; Boccaccini MT; Brodsky SL
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):103-20. PubMed ID: 12579621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethical issues in the evaluation and treatment of death row inmates.
Matthews D; Wendler S
Curr Opin Psychiatry; 2006 Sep; 19(5):518-21. PubMed ID: 16874127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Constitutional law--substantive due process--Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that criminal defendant's best interests justify forcible medication.--Commonwealth v. Sam, 952 A.2d 565 (Pa. 2008).
Harv Law Rev; 2009 May; 122(7):1961-8. PubMed ID: 19492499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Final declaration of the Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology concerning the participation of psychiatrists in executions].
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2005; 107(7):676-80. PubMed ID: 16146186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Competency in the criminal context: an analysis of Robert Schopp's views.
Slobogin C
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 16883613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Perry v. Louisiana: medical ethics on death row--is judicial intervention warranted?
Katz DL
Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(3):707-29. PubMed ID: 12186078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The ethics of the Texas death penalty and its impact on a prolonged appeals process.
Pearlman T
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(4):655-60. PubMed ID: 9894222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The normative concept of guilt in criminal law between freedom of will and neurobiological determinism].
Czerner F
Arch Kriminol; 2006; 218(5-6):129-57. PubMed ID: 17217181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Commentary: Atkins on a diet--a fit but lean guide for policy-makers.
Fitch WL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):314-6. PubMed ID: 15515921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Retributive constraints on the concept of competency: the required role of 'patently false beliefs' in understanding competency to be executed.
Saks E; Litt M
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 19156671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cruelty to the mentally ill: an Eighth Amendment challenge to the abolition of the insanity defense.
LeBlanc SM
Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Jun; 56(5):1281-328. PubMed ID: 17632959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The disposition of criminal charges after involuntary medication to restore competency to stand trial.
Ladds B; Convit A; Zito J; Vitrai J
J Forensic Sci; 1993 Nov; 38(6):1442-59. PubMed ID: 7903350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A National Survey of State Legislation defining mental retardation: implications for policy and practice after Atkins.
DeMatteo D; Marczyk G; Pich M
Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(6):781-802. PubMed ID: 18046743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The American Psychiatric Association's resource document on mental retardation and capital sentencing: implementing Atkins v. Virginia.
Bonnie RJ
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 15515919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Legislative arguments on execution of mentally ill--special reference to the Constitution of the United States of America].
Yokofujita M
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2005; 107(7):681-7. PubMed ID: 16250116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Utilizing therapists to obtain death penalty verdicts.
Weinstock R
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 8193387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Forcible medication: a new insanity defence.
Economist; 2003 Mar; 366(8313):31. PubMed ID: 15022679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medicate-to-execute: current trends in death penalty jurisprudence and the perils of dual loyalty.
Shaivitz DS
J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(1):149-74. PubMed ID: 15468506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
