146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16884368)
21. Clinical outcomes of cases with cervical dysplasia absent in cold knife conization specimens.
Baser E; Ozgu E; Erkilinc S; Yalcin H; Cetinkaya N; Sirvan L; Erkaya S; Gungor T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014 Jan; 14(11):6693-6. PubMed ID: 24377590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Reasonable surgical approach for grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Wu X; Cui Y; Gong Y; Xu H; Jiang D; Meng S
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Aug; 37(8):824-8. PubMed ID: 22954923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison between loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization for treatment of cervical dysplasia: residual disease in a subsequent hysterectomy specimen.
Huang LW; Hwang JL
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Apr; 73(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 10094873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cold-knife conization versus conization by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a randomized, prospective study.
Duggan BD; Felix JC; Muderspach LI; Gebhardt JA; Groshen S; Morrow CP; Roman LD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Feb; 180(2 Pt 1):276-82. PubMed ID: 9988787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Conservative treatment of microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix stage IA1: Defining conization height to an optimal oncological outcome.
Hartman CA; Bragança JF; Gurgel MSC; Zeferino LC; Andrade LALA; Teixeira JC
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253998. PubMed ID: 34283862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cold-knife conization versus the loop electrosurgical excision procedure for treatment of cervical dysplasia.
Bozanović T; Ljubic A; Momcilov P; Milicevic S; Mostić T; Atanacković J
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2008; 29(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 18386472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fertility-sparing treatment in younger women with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
van Hanegem N; Barroilhet LM; Nucci MR; Bernstein M; Feldman S
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jan; 124(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 22030403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. HPV status after cold knife conization.
Dimitrov G; Talevska B; Nikolovski S; Micevska M; Panov S; Dimitrov G
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2013; 52(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 23807985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Conservative management of stage IA1 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with positive resection margins after conization.
Kim WY; Chang SJ; Chang KH; Yoo SC; Ryu HS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 May; 109(2):110-2. PubMed ID: 20096835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Risk of residual invasive disease in women with microinvasive squamous cancer in a conization specimen.
Roman LD; Felix JC; Muderspach LI; Agahjanian A; Qian D; Morrow CP
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):759-64. PubMed ID: 9351760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Surgical treatment of microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of pathologic features with implications on radicality.
Yoneda JY; Braganca JF; Sarian LO; Borba PP; Conceição JC; Zeferino LC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):694-8. PubMed ID: 25742569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The value of loop electrosurgical conization in the treatment of stage IA1 microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Bekkers RL; Keyser KG; Bulten J; Hanselaar AG; Schijf CP; Boonstra H; Massuger LF
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2002; 12(5):485-9. PubMed ID: 12366667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Utility of conization with frozen section for intraoperative triage prior to definitive hysterectomy.
Martinelli F; Schmeler KM; Johnson C; Brown J; Euscher ED; Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Nov; 127(2):307-11. PubMed ID: 22842126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization method: its utility and reliability.
Matsumura M; Ota T; Takeshima N; Takizawa K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Aug; 20(6):1025-30. PubMed ID: 20683412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prediction of disease persistence after conization for microinvasive cervical carcinoma and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Lin H; Chang HY; Huang CC; Changchien CC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2004; 14(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 15086731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of cervical conization as a definitive treatment for microinvasive cervical carcinoma and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Takeda N; Suzuki T; Suzuki M; Matsuura M; Tanaka R; Fujii M; Ito E; Saito T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Feb; 285(2):453-7. PubMed ID: 21681515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term follow-up after cold-knife conization with involved margins.
Reich O; Lahousen M; Pickel H; Tamussino K; Winter R
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 11814495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Knife conization versus loop excision--clinical and histomorphologic results].
Girardi F; Heydarfadai M; Koroschetz F; Pickel H; Winter R
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1994; 34(3):162-4. PubMed ID: 7987084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Compliance after loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold knife cone biopsy.
Greenspan DL; Faubion M; Coonrod DV; Hart KW; Mathieson K
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):675-80. PubMed ID: 17766617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
