These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16884369)

  • 1. A comparative study of two devices used for cervical cell sampling raises some doubts about liquid-based cytology.
    Kothari A; Karim SZ; Gordon A; Raslan F; Abdalla M; George S
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006; 16(4):1579-86. PubMed ID: 16884369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving the quality of cervical screening.
    George S; Abrahams Y; Karim SZ; Kothari A
    BJOG; 2004 Sep; 111(9):960-6. PubMed ID: 15327611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervex brush versus vaginal-cervical-endocervical (VCE) triple smear techniques in cervical sampling.
    Järvi K
    Cytopathology; 1997 Aug; 8(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 9252746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the Cervex-Brush alone to Cytobrush plus Cervex-Brush for detection of cervical dysplasia in women with a transformation zone type 3.
    Manley KM; Wills AK; Villeneuve N; Hunt K; Patel A; Glew S
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):157-163. PubMed ID: 30414286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adequacy of cervical cytology sampling with the Cervex brush and the Aylesbury spatula: a population based randomised controlled trial.
    Dey P; Collins S; Desai M; Woodman C
    BMJ; 1996 Sep; 313(7059):721-3. PubMed ID: 8819441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Cervix cytology: Cervex Brush versus conventional cotton swab].
    Altermatt HJ; Wyler K; Fravi R; Liu X; Kraft R; Dreher E
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 1997 Jun; 86(24):1029-33. PubMed ID: 9312820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Acceptable quality cervical cytology taking: comparison of Cervex-brush and Cervex-mex methods].
    Ojeda Ortiz J; Muñoz Molina R; Pardo López M; Guevara Cruz M; Hernández Quijano T; Valencia Elizondo C; Hernández Valencia M
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2008 Jul; 76(7):381-5. PubMed ID: 18798438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A trial of two methods of taking cervical smears: the Aylesbury spatula plus cytology brush compared to the Cervex broom.
    Sparrow MJ; Fauck R; Gupta RK
    N Z Med J; 1997 Sep; 110(1052):356-8. PubMed ID: 9364178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
    Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical cytology: a randomized comparison of four sampling methods.
    McCord ML; Stovall TG; Meric JL; Summitt RL; Coleman SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 166(6 Pt 1):1772-7; discussion 1777-9. PubMed ID: 1615986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the efficacy of the cervex brush and the extended-tip wooden spatula with conventional cytology: a longitudinal study.
    Whitaker CJ; Stamp EC; Young W; Greenwood LA
    Cytojournal; 2009 Jan; 6():2. PubMed ID: 19495406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative yield of endocervical and metaplastic cells. Two sampling techniques: wooden spatula and cytology brush.
    Lo L; Jordan J
    Can Fam Physician; 1995 Sep; 41():1497-502. PubMed ID: 8520238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved endocervical sampling and HPV viral load detection by Cervex-Brush Combi.
    Depuydt CE; Benoy IH; Bailleul EJ; Vandepitte J; Vereecken AJ; Bogers JJ
    Cytopathology; 2006 Dec; 17(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 17168921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of seven cell collection devices for cervical smears.
    Kohlberger PD; Stani J; Gitsch G; Kieback DG; Breitenecker G
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(6):1023-6. PubMed ID: 10578973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervex-Brush vs. spatula and Cytobrush. A cytohistologic evaluation.
    Risberg B; Andersson A; Zetterberg C; Nordin B
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Jul; 42(7):405-8. PubMed ID: 9252930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Order of endocervical and ectocervical cytologic sampling and the quality of the Papanicolaou smear.
    Eisenberger D; Hernandez E; Tener T; Atkinson BF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):755-8. PubMed ID: 9351759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal collection technique and devices for a quality pap smear.
    Marchand L; Mundt M; Klein G; Agarwal SC
    WMJ; 2005 Aug; 104(6):51-5. PubMed ID: 16218317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Cervex: an ectocervical brush sampler.
    Waddell CA; Rollason TP; Amarilli JM; Cullimore J; McConkey CC
    Cytopathology; 1990; 1(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 2102356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of using the Cervex-Brush (broom) compared to the elongated spatula for collection of conventional cervical cytology samples within a high-burden HIV setting: a model-based analysis.
    Schnippel K; Michelow P; Chibwesha CJ; Makura C; Lince-Deroche N; Goeieman B; Mulongo M; Jordaan S; Firnhaber C
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Nov; 15():499. PubMed ID: 26545585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The importance of the cell sample in cervical cytology: a controlled trial of a new sampling device.
    Laverty CR; Farnsworth A; Thurloe JK; Bowditch RC
    Med J Aust; 1989 Apr; 150(8):432-4, 436. PubMed ID: 2716680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.