These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16884369)

  • 21. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
    Paraiso MF; Brady K; Helmchen R; Roat TW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of different sampling techniques on smear quality and the diagnosis of cytological abnormalities in cervical screening.
    Williamson SL; Hair T; Wadehra V
    Cytopathology; 1997 Jun; 8(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 9202894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of cytobrush with Cervex-Brush for endocervical cytologic sampling.
    Neinstein LS; Church J; Akiyoshi T
    J Adolesc Health; 1992 Sep; 13(6):520-3. PubMed ID: 1390820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for collecting samples for conventional and liquid-based cytology.
    Arbyn M; Herbert A; Schenck U; Nieminen P; Jordan J; Mcgoogan E; Patnick J; Bergeron C; Baldauf JJ; Klinkhamer P; Bulten J; Martin-Hirsch P
    Cytopathology; 2007 Jun; 18(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 17573762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Quality of conventional PAP smears. Quality assessment and motivation for improvement].
    Regitnig P; Nader A; Wiener H
    Pathologe; 2012 Jul; 33(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 22569927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush. Comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.
    Hutchinson M; Fertitta L; Goldbaum B; Hamza M; Vanerian S; Isenstein L
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Aug; 36(8):581-6. PubMed ID: 1941800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison between the Accu-Pap device and the extended-tip wooden Ayre spatula for cervical cytology sampling.
    Stock RJ; Thurmond AI; Passmore A
    Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 3376697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of the Cervex-Brush® Combi and the Cytobrush+Ayres Spatula Combination for Cervical Sampling in Liquid-Based Cytology.
    Simonsen M; Tavares Guerreiro Fregnani JH; Possati Resende JC; Antoniazzi M; Longatto-Filho A; Scapulatempo-Neto C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164077. PubMed ID: 27741238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
    Sigurdsson K
    Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
    Pretorius RG; Sadeghi M; Fotheringham N; Semrad N; Watring WG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative Assessment of a Self-sampling Device and Gynecologist Sampling for Cytology and HPV DNA Detection in a Rural and Low Resource Setting: Malaysian Experience.
    Latiff LA; Ibrahim Z; Pei CP; Rahman SA; Akhtari-Zavare M
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(18):8495-501. PubMed ID: 26745108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cell surplus on sampling devices after routine cervical cytologic smears. A study of residual cell populations.
    Goodman A; Hutchinson ML
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Apr; 41(4):239-41. PubMed ID: 8728075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
    Cannon JM; Blythe JG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples.
    Martin-Hirsch P; Jarvis G; Kitchener H; Lilford R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (3):CD001036. PubMed ID: 10908482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The comparative diagnostic accuracy of conventional and liquid-based cytology in a colposcopic setting.
    Hussein T; Desai M; Tomlinson A; Kitchener HC
    BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1542-6. PubMed ID: 16225576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of the sampling sequence on the quality of Papanicolaou smear.
    Rahnama P; Faghihzadeh S; Ziaei S
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 15670299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of a cervical brush for Papanicolaou smear collection. A meta-analysis.
    Bauman BJ
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1993; 38(5):267-75. PubMed ID: 8246082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimal sampling devices for liquid-based procedure in screening for cervical cancer: comparison between cotton stick/Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush.
    Kuramoto H; Banno M; Hori M; Miyagawa J; Iida M; Kawaguchi M
    Acta Cytol; 2013; 57(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 23406881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush.
    Partoll LM; Javaheri G
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.