BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

496 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16884423)

  • 1. Assessment of abstracts submitted to the annual scientific meeting of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.
    Bydder S; Marion K; Taylor M; Semmens J
    Australas Radiol; 2006 Aug; 50(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 16884423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Publication rate of abstracts from the annual ASTRO meeting: comparison with other organizations.
    Papagikos MA; Rossi PJ; Lee WR
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jan; 2(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 17411764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Publication rates of abstracts presented at annual scientific meetings: how does the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists compare?
    Bydder SA; Joseph DJ; Spry NA
    Australas Radiol; 2004 Mar; 48(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 15027917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The value of a scientific writing training workshop for radiologists and radiation oncologists.
    Bydder S; Packer D; Semmens J
    Australas Radiol; 2006 Feb; 50(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 16499724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interrater reliability in grading abstracts for the orthopaedic trauma association.
    Bhandari M; Templeman D; Tornetta P
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Jun; (423):217-21. PubMed ID: 15232452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does presentation at the Registrars' Papers Day predict future publication?
    Wong SW; Crowe PJ
    ANZ J Surg; 2006 Jun; 76(6):522-5. PubMed ID: 16768782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The impact of the annual scientific meetings of the Israel Society of Rheumatology as measured by publication rates of the abstracts in peer-reviewed journals].
    Perez S; Hashkes PJ; Uziel Y
    Harefuah; 2004 Apr; 143(4):266-9, 319. PubMed ID: 15116582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of abstracts submitted for the annual meeting of the German Neurosurgical Society 1999--unravelling a mystery.
    Uhl E; Steiger HJ; Barth C; Reulen HJ
    Zentralbl Neurochir; 1999; 60(4):196-201. PubMed ID: 10674337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Promoting a research culture among junior radiation oncologists: outcomes from the introduction of the Australian and New Zealand research requirement in training.
    Thiruthaneeswaran N; Turner S; Milross C; Gogna K
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2014 Mar; 26(3):162-73. PubMed ID: 24447718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Duplicate presentations on prostate cancer at American Urological Association and European Association of Urology annual meetings.
    Pop GH; Fesperman SF; Ball DA; Yeung LL; Vieweg J; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2009 Aug; 182(2):674-8; discussion 678-9. PubMed ID: 19535105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of a structured method of selecting abstracts for a plastic surgical scientific meeting.
    van der Steen LP; Hage JJ; Kon M; Mazzola R
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Jun; 111(7):2215-22. PubMed ID: 12794462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Publication bias in papers presented to the Australian Orthopaedic Association Annual Scientific Meeting.
    Harris IA; Mourad MS; Kadir A; Solomon MJ; Young JM
    ANZ J Surg; 2006 Jun; 76(6):427-31. PubMed ID: 16768761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Profile of a meeting: how abstracts are written and reviewed.
    Panush RS; Delafuente JC; Connelly CS; Edwards NL; Greer JM; Longley S; Bennett F
    J Rheumatol; 1989 Feb; 16(2):145-7. PubMed ID: 2746562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Continuous quality improvement applied to a scientific assembly: the history of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.
    Schwartz RJ; Jacobs LM; Gabram SG; Bennett-Jacobs B
    J Trauma; 1993 Oct; 35(4):544-9. PubMed ID: 8411277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Writing good abstracts.
    Alexandrov AV; Hennerici MG
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2007; 23(4):256-9. PubMed ID: 17199082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A critical evaluation of free paper abstracts accepted for the 1996 RACS Annual Scientific Congress.
    Usatoff V; Waxman BP
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1997 Jan; 67(1):45-6. PubMed ID: 9033376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the quality of abstract reporting for phase I cancer trials.
    Strevel EL; Chau NG; Pond GR; Murgo AJ; Ivy PS; Siu LL
    Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Mar; 14(6):1782-7. PubMed ID: 18347180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reporting of uncertainty at the 2013 annual meeting of the American Society for Radiation Oncology.
    Lee WR
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 May; 89(1):222-3. PubMed ID: 24725704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of blinded versus unblinded abstract review on scientific program content.
    Smith J; Nixon R; Bueschen AJ; Venable DD; Henry HH
    J Urol; 2002 Nov; 168(5):2123-5. PubMed ID: 12394728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Projected requirements for radiation oncologists and trainees in Australia and New Zealand to 2007.
    Morgan G; Wigg D; Childs J
    Australas Radiol; 2000 Feb; 44(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 10761265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.