These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16884603)

  • 41. Health technology appraisal of interventional procedures: comparison of rapid and slow methods.
    Warren V
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Jul; 12(3):142-6. PubMed ID: 17716416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Healthcare technology for managers. Test drive.
    Drummond M
    Health Serv J; 1992 Oct; 102(5325):26-7. PubMed ID: 10122032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A furore too far: the widespread disquiet undermining NICE.
    Carlisle D
    Health Serv J; 2006 Jun; 116(6011):14-5. PubMed ID: 16827515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Quality, innovation, and value for money: NICE and the British National Health Service.
    Pearson SD; Rawlins MD
    JAMA; 2005 Nov; 294(20):2618-22. PubMed ID: 16304076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Voice-recognition systems. Vocal score.
    Dudman J
    Health Serv J; 2000 May; 110(5706):suppl 4-5. PubMed ID: 11183791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An introduction to statistical methods for health technology assessment.
    White SJ; Ashby D; Brown PJ
    Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(8):i-iv, 1-59. PubMed ID: 10944742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. NICE reports. NICE to see you...
    Bosanquet N
    Health Serv J; 2003 Jun; 113(5860):30-1. PubMed ID: 12852103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care.
    Maier-Hein L; Eisenmann M; Reinke A; Onogur S; Stankovic M; Scholz P; Arbel T; Bogunovic H; Bradley AP; Carass A; Feldmann C; Frangi AF; Full PM; van Ginneken B; Hanbury A; Honauer K; Kozubek M; Landman BA; März K; Maier O; Maier-Hein K; Menze BH; Müller H; Neher PF; Niessen W; Rajpoot N; Sharp GC; Sirinukunwattana K; Speidel S; Stock C; Stoyanov D; Taha AA; van der Sommen F; Wang CW; Weber MA; Zheng G; Jannin P; Kopp-Schneider A
    Nat Commun; 2018 Dec; 9(1):5217. PubMed ID: 30523263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Technology in medicine -- ethics, politics and reality.
    Watts JL; Blanchard R; Guyatt G; Miller D; Singer P; Haynes RB; Van Loon R
    Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1992 Feb; 25(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 11653977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Embracing the future. We need another Flexner report to shake up and restructure healthcare.
    Van Gorder C; Topol E
    Mod Healthc; 2012 May; 42(20):24. PubMed ID: 22666968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Public and patient involvement. Sync tech and care for better health.
    O'HanIon S
    Health Serv J; 2014 Aug; 124(6412):24-5. PubMed ID: 25509571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Innovation, NICE, and CardioQ.
    Campbell B
    Br J Anaesth; 2012 May; 108(5):726-9. PubMed ID: 22499745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Health Technology Assessment: managing the introduction and use of medical devices in clinical practice in Italy.
    Migliore A; Ratti M; Cerbo M; Jefferson T
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2009 May; 6(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 19419283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [When new methods are about to be introduced].
    Graff BA; Thürmer H; Søreide O; Norderhaug IN
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Feb; 128(4):472. PubMed ID: 18274585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. NICE and its value judgments: favourable appraisal amounts to compulsory purchase order.
    Rao JN
    BMJ; 2004 Sep; 329(7468):740-1; author reply 741. PubMed ID: 15388620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reimbursement programs and health technology assessment for diabetes devices and supplies: a Canadian perspective.
    Cheung RY; Mui V
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 May; 9(3):706-10. PubMed ID: 25697719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [SR/PS-method for using data of primary studies from systematic reviews in the evaluation of health technologies].
    Gorenoi V; Hagen A
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(5-6):325-32. PubMed ID: 25066352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The Technophobe's Guide to the Digital Age.
    Varley R
    Br J Gen Pract; 2015 Jul; 65(636):362. PubMed ID: 26120119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of connected health technology.
    O'Neill SA; Nugent CD; Donnelly MP; McCullagh P; McLaughlin J
    Technol Health Care; 2012; 20(3):151-67. PubMed ID: 22735731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Health technology assessments in England: an analysis of the NICE Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme.
    Green W; Hutton J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2014 Jun; 15(5):449-52. PubMed ID: 24212358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.