142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16885105)
1. The moral foundations of equipoise and its role in international research.
London AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):48-51; discussion W42-5. PubMed ID: 16885105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research revisited.
Miller FG
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):59-61; discussion W42-5. PubMed ID: 16885110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The real problem with equipoise.
Chiong W
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):37-47. PubMed ID: 16885104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical ethics versus clinical research.
Appelbaum PS; Lidz CW
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):53-5; discussion W42-5. PubMed ID: 16885107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Equipoise in the real world.
Paradis C
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):61-3; discussion W42-5. PubMed ID: 16885111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. International codes of research ethics: current controversies and the future.
Levine RJ
Indiana Law Rev; 2002; 35(2):557-67. PubMed ID: 16189916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Are there three or four distinct types of medical practice?
Brody H
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):51-3; discussion W42-5. PubMed ID: 16885106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What do I tell my patient?
Thompson DR
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):66-7; discussion W42-5. PubMed ID: 16885113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A critique of clinical equipoise. Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials.
Miller FG; Brody H
Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(3):19-28. PubMed ID: 12854452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extensions and refinements of the equipoise concept in international clinical research: would Benjamin Freedman approve?
Mann H
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):67-9; discussion W42-5. PubMed ID: 16885114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The challenge of assuring continued post-trial access to beneficial treatment.
Grady C
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):425-35. PubMed ID: 15742586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Bench to bedside: mapping the moral terrain of clinical research.
Joffe S; Miller FG
Hastings Cent Rep; 2008; 38(2):30-42. PubMed ID: 18457227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conflating scientific with clinical considerations.
van der Graaf R; van Delden JJ
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):58-9. PubMed ID: 19998198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Therapeutic obligation in clinical research.
Weijer C; Miller PB
Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(3):3. PubMed ID: 12854444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Defending the distinction between research and medical care.
Litton P
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):63-6; discussion W42-5. PubMed ID: 16885112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A clinical perspective on placebo research: looking back, looking forward.
Dworkin RW
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):54-5. PubMed ID: 19998196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Human subjects research with prisoners: putting the ethical question in context.
Obasogie OK; Reiter KA
Bioethics; 2011 Jan; 25(1):55-6. PubMed ID: 21158873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. I thought we were in this together?
Trachtman H
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 12189071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Making research a requirement of treatment: why we should sometimes let doctors pressure patients to participate in research.
Orentlicher D
Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(5):20-8. PubMed ID: 16295261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical equipoise: more uncertainty.
DeMarco JP; Markman M
Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(6):4; author reply 4-5. PubMed ID: 14983548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]