226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16885108)
1. Why researchers cannot establish equipoise.
Veatch RM
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):55-7. PubMed ID: 16885108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Making research a requirement of treatment: why we should sometimes let doctors pressure patients to participate in research.
Orentlicher D
Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(5):20-8. PubMed ID: 16295261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical ethics versus clinical research.
Appelbaum PS; Lidz CW
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):53-5; discussion W42-5. PubMed ID: 16885107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Putting the "ethics" into "research ethics".
Spike J
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):51-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The physician's role, "sham surgery," and trust: a conflict of duties?
Clark CC
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):57-8. PubMed ID: 14744337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Being directly responsive and accountable to human-research participants.
Fleming DA; Reynolds D
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Mar; 8(3):24-5; discussion W4-6. PubMed ID: 18570094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Equipoise may be in the eye of the beholder.
Moyer A; Floyd AH
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):21-2. PubMed ID: 19180388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Equipoise trumps randomization.
Fox MD; Hellman CM; Jelley MR
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):13-4. PubMed ID: 19180383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A closer look at the bad deal trial: beyond clinical equipoise.
Jansen LA
Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(5):29-36. PubMed ID: 16295262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The importance of social, cultural, and economic contexts, and empirical research in examining "undue inducement".
Klitzman R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):19-21. PubMed ID: 16179300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Additional thoughts on rethinking research ethics.
Sharp RR; Yarborough M
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):40-2; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical challenges in research: another look.
Bird SJ
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Sep; 8(9):15-7. PubMed ID: 18853373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The irrelevance of equipoise.
Veatch RM
J Med Philos; 2007; 32(2):167-83. PubMed ID: 17454421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conflict of interest in human subjects research.
Groeger JS; Barnes M
Crit Care Med; 2003 Mar; 31(3 Suppl):S137-42. PubMed ID: 12626959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Undue inducement: nonsense on stilts?
Emanuel EJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):9-13; discussion W8-11, W17. PubMed ID: 16179296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. How to resolve an ethical dilemma concerning randomized clinical trials.
Marquis D
N Engl J Med; 1999 Aug; 341(9):691-3. PubMed ID: 10460824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A modest proposal.
Burris S; Davis C
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Nov; 9(11):W3-4. PubMed ID: 19882443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Undue inducements and reasonable risks: will the dismal science lead to dismal research ethics?
London AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):29-32. PubMed ID: 16179305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Equipoise in the real world.
Paradis C
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):61-3; discussion W42-5. PubMed ID: 16885111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A quartet of criticisms.
Vanderpool HY
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):16-9. PubMed ID: 16179299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
