These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16885141)

  • 1. Orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects emerge even when the stimulus position is task irrelevant.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jun; 59(6):1021-32. PubMed ID: 16885141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transfer of orthogonal stimulus-response mappings to an orthogonal Simon task.
    Bae GY; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Apr; 62(4):746-65. PubMed ID: 18780263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Representing response position relative to display location: influence on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Jul; 58(5):839-64. PubMed ID: 16194938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):320-40. PubMed ID: 19526436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transfer of response codes from choice-response to go/no-go tasks.
    Ansorge U; Wühr P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1216-35. PubMed ID: 19096944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transfer of noncorresponding spatial associations to the auditory Simon task.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Vu KP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jan; 33(1):245-53. PubMed ID: 17201566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulus-set location does not affect orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2004 Dec; 69(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 14634811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influences of multiple spatial stimulus and response codes on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Aug; 66(6):1003-17. PubMed ID: 15675647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Simon effect for stimulus-response duration.
    Kunde W; Stöcker C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):581-92. PubMed ID: 12047060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influences of response position and hand posture on the orthogonal Simon effect.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Jul; 61(7):1020-35. PubMed ID: 18938283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension.
    Lu CH; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):286-98. PubMed ID: 8189193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The enhanced Simon effect for older adults is reduced when the irrelevant location information is conveyed by an accessory stimulus.
    Proctor RW; Pick DF; Vu KP; Anderson RE
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 May; 119(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 15823241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Coding specificity of orthogonal S-R compatibility].
    Kleinsorge T
    Z Exp Psychol; 1999; 46(4):249-64. PubMed ID: 10551040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual and auditory accessory stimulus offset and the Simon effect.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 20952792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Horizontal and vertical Simon effect: different underlying mechanisms?
    Vallesi A; Mapelli D; Schiff S; Amodio P; Umiltà C
    Cognition; 2005 May; 96(1):B33-43. PubMed ID: 15833304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters.
    Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining priority between attentional and referential-coding sources of the Simon effect through optokinetic stimulation.
    Figliozzi F; Silvetti M; Rubichi S; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Mar; 48(4):1011-5. PubMed ID: 19961865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influences of different combinations of conceptual, perceptual, and structural similarity on stimulus-response compatibility.
    Proctor RW; Wang H; Vu KP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 11873856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Notebaert W; Vandierendonck A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Nov; 120(3):307-26. PubMed ID: 15993830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.