These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16885668)

  • 21. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
    Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factors affecting the likelihood of successful induction after intravaginal misoprostol application for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Tran S; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 186(6):1237-40; discussion 1240-3. PubMed ID: 12066104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for cervical ripening in women for labor induction at term (the IMPROVE trial): a triple-masked randomized controlled trial.
    Haas DM; Daggy J; Flannery KM; Dorr ML; Bonsack C; Bhamidipalli SS; Pierson RC; Lathrop A; Towns R; Ngo N; Head A; Morgan S; Quinney SK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):259.e1-259.e16. PubMed ID: 31075246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 175(1):158-64. PubMed ID: 8694043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Pevzner L; Alfirevic Z; Powers BL; Wing DA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jun; 156(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 21353372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
    How HY; Leaseburge L; Khoury JC; Siddiqi TA; Spinnato JA; Sibai BM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 11641677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: 25 vs. 50 microg dose regimen.
    El-Sherbiny MT; El-Gharieb IH; Gewely HA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2001 Jan; 72(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 11146073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Cecatti JG; Tedesco RP; Pires HM; Calderon IM; Faúndes A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):706-11. PubMed ID: 16752263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predicting factors on cervical ripening and response to induction in women pregnant over 37 weeks.
    Bahadori F; Ayatollahi H; Naghavi-Behzad M; Khalkhali H; Naseri Z
    Med Ultrason; 2013 Sep; 15(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 23979614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cervical ripening and induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol and Foley catheter cervical traction.
    Kashanian M; Akbarian AR; Fekrat M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Jan; 92(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 16246342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A benefit-risk assessment of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction.
    Wing DA
    Drug Saf; 2002; 25(9):665-76. PubMed ID: 12137560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Labor induction with randomized comparison of cervical, oral and intravaginal misoprostol.
    Dadashaliha M; Fallah S; Mirzadeh M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Oct; 21(1):721. PubMed ID: 34706675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of 25 and 50 microg vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction of cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Has R; Batukan C; Ermis H; Cevher E; Araman A; Kiliç G; Ibrahimoğlu L
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2002; 53(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 11803223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Labor induction with 25 microg versus 50 microg intravaginal misoprostol: a systematic review.
    Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM; Delke I
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jan; 99(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 11777525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of efficacy and safety of sublingual misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening in prelabour rupture of membranes after 34 weeks of gestation.
    Jha N; Sagili H; Jayalakshmi D; Lakshminarayanan S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jan; 291(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 25055933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone vaginal insert: a systematic review and metaanalysis.
    Austin SC; Sanchez-Ramos L; Adair CD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jun; 202(6):624.e1-9. PubMed ID: 20430362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Oral misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized comparison.
    Bartha JL; Comino-Delgado R; Garcia-Benasach F; Martinez-Del-Fresno P; Moreno-Corral LJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 96(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 10960643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Labor induction post-term with 25 micrograms vs. 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol.
    Meydanli MM; Calişkan E; Burak F; Narin MA; Atmaca R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jun; 81(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 12767565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Oral misoprostol vs. vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Adam I; Hassan OA; Elhassan EM
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 May; 89(2):142-3. PubMed ID: 15847879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.