These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16885670)

  • 1. Oral misoprostol administration for labor induction.
    Weeks A; Alfirevic Z
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 49(3):658-71. PubMed ID: 16885670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    le Roux PA; Olarogun JO; Penny J; Anthony J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 11814497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy.
    Wang X; Yang A; Ma Q; Li X; Qin L; He T
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
    Alfirevic Z
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (2):CD001338. PubMed ID: 11405987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour.
    Chen W; Xue J; Peprah MK; Wen SW; Walker M; Gao Y; Tang Y
    BJOG; 2016 Feb; 123(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 26538408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misoprostol compared with prostaglandin E2 for labour induction in women at term with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix: a systematic review.
    Crane JM; Butler B; Young DC; Hannah ME
    BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1366-76. PubMed ID: 17081181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone vaginal insert: a systematic review and metaanalysis.
    Austin SC; Sanchez-Ramos L; Adair CD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jun; 202(6):624.e1-9. PubMed ID: 20430362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of efficacy and safety of sublingual misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening in prelabour rupture of membranes after 34 weeks of gestation.
    Jha N; Sagili H; Jayalakshmi D; Lakshminarayanan S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jan; 291(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 25055933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Ham D; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 180(5):1155-60. PubMed ID: 10329871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.
    Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction.
    Farah LA; Sanchez-Ramos L; Rosa C; Del Valle GO; Gaudier FL; Delke I; Kaunitz AM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 177(2):364-9; discussion 369-71. PubMed ID: 9290452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Misoprostol for induction of labor with a live fetus.
    Weeks A; Alfirevic Z; Faúndes A; Hofmeyr GJ; Safar P; Wing D
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Dec; 99 Suppl 2():S194-7. PubMed ID: 17961564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized trial.
    Sanchez-Ramos L; Peterson DE; Delke I; Gaudier FL; Kaunitz AM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Mar; 91(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 9491868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison].
    Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Hanel C; Chen FC
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
    Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor.
    Rouzi AA; Alsibiani S; Mansouri N; Alsinani N; Darhouse K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 210(1):56.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23999422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (1):CD000941. PubMed ID: 12535398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oral, vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for induction of labor.
    Bartusevicius A; Barcaite E; Nadisauskiene R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Oct; 91(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 16109419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.