These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16885673)

  • 1. Elective induction of labor.
    Moore LE; Rayburn WF
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 49(3):698-704. PubMed ID: 16885673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimizing the risks from elective induction of labor.
    Rayburn WF
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Aug; 52(8):671-6. PubMed ID: 17879826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies.
    Rayburn WF; Zhang J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jul; 100(1):164-7. PubMed ID: 12100818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maternal perceptions of the experience of attempted labor induction and medically elective inductions: analysis of survey results from listening to mothers in California.
    Declercq E; Belanoff C; Iverson R
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Aug; 20(1):458. PubMed ID: 32787802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Elective induction of labor: failure to follow guidelines and risk of cesarean delivery.
    Le Ray C; Carayol M; Bréart G; Goffinet F;
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(6):657-65. PubMed ID: 17520395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reduction of elective inductions in a large community hospital.
    Reisner DP; Wallin TK; Zingheim RW; Luthy DA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 200(6):674.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19376493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment of suspected fetal macrosomia: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Herbst MA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1035-9. PubMed ID: 16157107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Labor induction process improvement: a patient quality-of-care initiative.
    Fisch JM; English D; Pedaline S; Brooks K; Simhan HN
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 113(4):797-803. PubMed ID: 19305322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas.
    Vahratian A; Zhang J; Troendle JF; Sciscione AC; Hoffman MK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):698-704. PubMed ID: 15802393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Elective induction: When? Ever?
    Grobman WA
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 50(2):537-46. PubMed ID: 17513939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Elective and routine induction of labor. A retrospective analysis of 274 cases.
    Wigton TR; Wolk BM
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Jan; 39(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 8169911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women.
    Ecker JL; Chen KT; Cohen AP; Riley LE; Lieberman ES
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):883-7. PubMed ID: 11641671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [In case of fetal macrosomia, the best strategy is the induction of labor at 38 weeks of gestation].
    Rozenberg P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Nov; 45(9):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 27771202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound.
    Rouse DJ; Owen J; Goldenberg RL; Cliver SP
    JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(18):1480-6. PubMed ID: 8903259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor after sonographic diagnosis of fetal macrosomia.
    Combs CA; Singh NB; Khoury JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Apr; 81(4):492-6. PubMed ID: 8459954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A systematic review of implementing an elective labor induction policy.
    Akinsipe DC; Villalobos LE; Ridley RT
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2012 Jan; 41(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 22834718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Severe preeclampsia remote from term: labor induction or elective cesarean delivery?
    Nassar AH; Adra AM; Chakhtoura N; Gómez-Marín O; Beydoun S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 179(5):1210-3. PubMed ID: 9822502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
    Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Elective induction of labor and the risk of cesarean section in low-risk parous women: a cohort study.
    Jonsson M; Cnattingius S; Wikström AK
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Feb; 92(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 23157554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.